Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. Naomi Wolf: Pfizer’s Depopulation Agenda, As Evidenced By Its Own Documents Targets Reproductive Cycle of Women
PatriotandLiberty ^ | 6/2/23 | Dr Naomi Wolf

Posted on 06/03/2023 1:35:50 AM PDT by spirited irish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Pelham
While all of the text you have published obviously condemns Naomi Wolf, it nevertheless appears she is growing away, perhaps by baby steps, from those positions. Evil can have a life-changing effect---for the better---on some people, and Wolf might well be among that group.

If you've never read George Nash's "Intellectual Conservative Movement in America Since 1945' I strongly urge you to do so. In its pages you will discover that America's strongest conservative leaders began much like Wolf in terms of the ideological systems they advocated: socialism, progressivism, communism; anarchy, etc. It was the catastrophic destruction, massive deaths, and other evils that devastated Western civilization and areas of the world through application of those very ideologies (WWII) that led these men to reject their favored ideologies and turn to the defense of Western civilization and its foundation in Christianity. Many of these men converted to Christianity.

All humans have within themselves the capacity to reject the wrong way and turn to the right way. With respect to Naomi Wolf, we ought to hope she is in process of rejecting her wrong beliefs and moving to the embrace of morally higher beliefs as did the original conservative leaders.

If interested in Nash's book, here is the link: https://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121

61 posted on 06/04/2023 2:17:27 AM PDT by spirited irish ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

The people George Nash wrote about weren’t sloppy thinking poseurs which is what Naomi Wolf has been as she flits from fad to fad.

If you’re comparing her to James Burnham you have judgement issues


62 posted on 06/04/2023 7:34:12 AM PDT by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Angelino97

To imply that her not having an MD is disposative of all her writings on the jabs, yes.


63 posted on 06/04/2023 7:35:35 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
The people George Nash wrote about weren’t sloppy thinking poseurs which is what Naomi Wolf has been as she flits from fad to fad.

The point made was definitely NOT about writing styles and sloppy thinking, that is your sloppy presumption, but about our capacity to change for the better.

If you’re comparing her to James Burnham you have judgement issues

Nowhere have I compared her to Burnham. Burnham is your presumption, so do not find me guilty of your presumptiouness.

64 posted on 06/04/2023 1:55:52 PM PDT by spirited irish ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

I think she’s wacky but I don’t doubt the agenda she exposes.


65 posted on 06/04/2023 5:16:05 PM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

“Nowhere have I compared her to Burnham. Burnham is your presumption, so do not find me guilty of your presumptiouness.”

Oh really? Well you compare her with the subjects of Nash’s book saying this:

” I strongly urge you to do so. In its pages you will discover that America’s strongest conservative leaders began much like Wolf in terms of the ideological systems they advocated: socialism, progressivism, communism; anarchy, etc.”

Burnham began life as a Marxist. Who else featured in Nash’s book do you think fits your “ism” list besides Burnham? Whittaker Chambers? Frank Meyer? Those two might work. The rest don’t.

It wouldn’t matter because even Wolf’s old fembot pals regard her as an intellectual lightweight whose PhD thesis was garbage.


66 posted on 06/04/2023 6:37:55 PM PDT by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Who cares about her personality if she has a team of people helping her get the information out to the public. Forest meet trees.


67 posted on 06/04/2023 7:07:41 PM PDT by vivenne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

For heavens sakes! So Burnham began as a Marxist. So what! He has no place here but in your overheated imagination and presumptuous projections. This is my final response to you.


68 posted on 06/05/2023 1:26:52 AM PDT by spirited irish ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ViLaLuz
I think she’s wacky but I don’t doubt the agenda she exposes.

Agree. But evil can have a powerful effect on the lost and pull them over to the right side where a change for good can be effected. It's my hope this will be the case with her.

69 posted on 06/05/2023 1:29:53 AM PDT by spirited irish ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: spirited irish

Amen!


70 posted on 06/05/2023 3:53:40 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson