And Robert Kennedy Jr is just another Kennedy wannabe
Posted on 06/03/2023 1:35:50 AM PDT by spirited irish
... and save us from feeling so overwhelmed by these overly heated discussions.
This is a lot more than birth control that we are talking about.
As I am sure you know, one of the reasons for the uproar against the jabs is that it completely ignores the practice of "informed consent", which is something everyone has a right to.
If you don't have a problem with African women being given birth control without their knowledge, then don't be shocked when the Pharmaceutical Industrial Complex sets its sights on you.
www.naturalnews.com/2023-04-26-no-more-normal-placentas-since-vaccine-rollout.html
Whistleblower and renowned writer Naomi Wolf recently revealed that no more normal placentas have been seen since the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines were rolled out.
The DailyClout CEO obtained the information from midwives she had talked to. According to the midwives, placentas of vaccinated mothers are shrunken and have a silver-gray color. These signs mean that the placentas are not big enough to sustain a normal baby.
It may take years before we learn what was on anyone's mind when these shots were created. However, as Ed Dowd points out, there is overwhelming evidence that these shots are doing harm and need to be pulled from the market.
Eventually, a line is crossed where logic is defied; intent to harm can be demonstrated by allowing these shots to remain on the market.
You misunderstand.
I am not discrediting her work on the Wuhan Flu vaccines, but trying to explain her personality and how she approaches the issue.
Video (Dr. Arne Burkhardt):
Histopathological reevaluation serious adverse events and deaths following COVID-19 vaccination
And Einstein was a clerk in the patents office.
And Robert Kennedy Jr is just another Kennedy wannabe
If I were to de-populate the earth, I would start with the double-blind vax approach as to remain under the radar. Then a little bit down the road (I would have time because my oligarchy has been entrenched in governments around the world, with no recourse for removal), I would move in for the kill. This will take place in the coming months.
Right. Shoot, it was those with medical degrees that pushed this nonsense.
Already we’re told to anticipate several more ‘pandemics’ that will no doubt add to the still climbing deaths from the first pandemic.
Amen.
Get stuffed with your strawman and ad hominem, troll.
Get rekt, $hot $hill.
Well done, spokeshave. Give it to him amidships!
“Doctor” Naomi Wolf is a doctor of feminist literature, not a medical doctor.
https://unherd.com/2019/10/how-did-naomi-wolf-get-away-with-it-for-so-long/
“Outrages: Sex, Censorship and the Criminalisation of Love” was based on the PhD thesis that Wolf had written in 2015 and largely centred on the poet John Addington Symonds. It was Wolf’s contention that the gay poet had the risk of execution hanging over his head in Victorian England. To prove this Wolf claimed that she had identified “dozens and dozens” of gay men of the era who had been executed — a punishment which was believed to have ceased for the crime of sodomy many years before.
In their discussion Sweet pointed out that Wolf had made a major if understandable error. The men in whose cases the words “death recorded” was listed were not in fact executed (as Wolf had assumed) but were trials in which the judge had actually abstained from pronouncing a death sentence.
What is more, Wolf appeared to think that charges of “sodomy” related to the modern understanding of the term whereas in the era about which she was writing the term referred also to child abuse. Meaning that one of the cases the author highlighted was not in fact (as she said) that of a 14-year-old executed in 1859 for the crime of sodomy, but a man convicted (and not executed) for performing an indecent act on a six-year-old.
Needless to say, this is the stuff of authorial nightmares. And doubtless there will be some accounting at Wolf’s publishers over how such elementary mistakes were able to slip by unquestioned.
The problem, though, is that Wolf’s error is not a one-off, but part of a pattern of shoddy research in a career spanning nearly three decades. Her first book, The Beauty Myth (1991) was marred by a number of problems. One was the undeniable having-it-both-ways by which Wolf simultaneously lamented the imposition of certain societal norms of attractiveness while not exactly presenting her worst side, nor failing to benefit from that happy chance.
The more serious problem with the book, however, was the shoddy research for which she immediately became known. Wolf infamously claimed that 150,000 women were dying from anorexia-related eating disorders each year in America. As the writer Christina Hoff Sommers subsequently showed (in her 1995 book Who Stole Feminism?), the actual figure had been exaggerated several hundred times over by Wolf, and the actual figure was between 100 and 400.
The strand of slackness soon merged, as it so often does, with the paranoid style. In 2007 she was one of those American writers who honestly seemed to believe that George W Bush was, in his last days in office, not looking forward to retirement and a quieter life but was in fact preparing to govern forever. In a book titled The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot Wolf suggested that the then President and his team were enacting the playbook that dictators had used throughout the twentieth century.
Among Wolf’s claims were that the Bush administration was in the process of coercing not only the media but also American academia to their dastardly plans. As anybody with even the slightest knowledge of either institution would know, if the Bush administration ever had sought to coerce the entirety of the US media and Academy then it was — against some competition — the least successful effort of that administration.
In her book, as well as a long piece in The Guardian summing up that book’s arguments, Wolf made nods to reality, but then hid them as fast as she could. For instance we read: “It is not that global Islamist terrorism is not a severe danger; of course it is. I am arguing rather that the language used to convey the nature of the threat….” Etc etc. But soon even that “of course-ery” became lost. Even though George Bush miraculously stood down and allowed Barack Obama to enter the Oval Office, Wolf’s warnings of an imminent fascist coup in America continued unabated.
By this stage Wolf had tumbled the whole way down the Gore Vidal trail along which so many bright American men and women go as they start to believe that they are living in a proto-fascist state; one that is especially intent on misleading and suppressing figures like themselves at the vanguard of the resistance. As Wolf publicly stumbled along this well-trodden path she even began to engage in that “I’m only asking questions” form of conspiracy theory that vague and lazy people have such a habit of falling into.
In 2012 Wolf threw herself feet first into the Occupy Wall Street Movement, apparently in the hope that here was the way to stop the imminent coup. But the fact that Occupy fell apart was simply more evidence of the fascist nature of the American state. In The Guardian (yet again) she maintained that the US government were conspiring with the American banks to impose a “totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent”.
It got uglier. By 2014 she began suggesting that the carefully packaged beheading videos which the terrorist group ISIS was then releasing on a weekly basis were not what they seemed; indeed Wolf began declaring that these videos were in fact “staged” by the American government.
So far down this Alex Jones-ian path did Wolf go that she even went on shamefully to suggest that both the victims of these terrible acts and their families were in fact actors. In the inevitable criticism elicited by her inhumane comments Wolf fell back on the old conspiracist claim that she was “only asking questions”, because isn’t this what journalists are meant to do and so on.
Perhaps Wolf took the time off to do her PhD at Oxford in the middle of this decade because it had all got a bit too much for her; after all, one must suppose that warning about a fascism that never emerges would take a toll on anyone. And so Wolf went back to university and back to basics. The problem – as the pulping of her latest book shows – is that the basics of Wolf’s work are sloppy and error-ridden while the developed work is not so good, relying merely on paranoia and delusion.
Perhaps at some point the two styles will merge and we will be able to read of how the Bush and Obama administrations deliberately smuggled errors into the archives on John Addington Symonds in order to sabotage their valiant critic. I for one shall look forward to the next book.
Who else worked in the patents office....?
Hint....in UK
Another hint...established the mathematics of warfare...used extensively in WWII by the allies..
To state that Naomi Wolf does not have a medical degree is an "ad hominem"?
Genocide by the democrats and the UN.
The evil are immensely foolish. They eat the food, live in the mansions, and fly the planes for example, that are the work of the people destined for extermination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.