No one responded to my comment, #7.
I did indeed err in thinking you were referring to the original post when you were referring to your comment #7.
You’re kind of a moron, aren’t you?
LOLz ... Not at all. You're more than "kind of" an a$$hole, aren't you? I incorrectly thought you referenced the article because it seemed out of place for someone to believe their comment was so drastically insightful that it must be replied to. It is no wonder no one responded.
I think I will follow their lead.
Sorry.
But read your first paragraph to me again.
After I wrote my response I knew it was overtly garsh — after I read the rest of your post. :)