Well the Catholics are of a branch that rarely consult the bible for whats right.
Absolute nonsense.
Well the Catholics are of a branch that rarely consult the bible for whats right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How old are you?
Well the Catholics are of a branch that rarely consult the bible for whats right.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Exactly what all Pentecostal snake handlers are taught to believe. Look, you should stop writing such nonsense and find someone to teach you how to compose grammatically correct sentences! You’re embarrassing other Freepers!
Rather, aside from use of Scripture for devotion and doctrines that are actually taught therein, they search the bible for texts which support distinctive Catholic teachings are not manifest in the only wholly God-inspired, substantive, authoritative record of what the NT church believed (which is Scripture, in particular Acts through Revelation, which best shows how the NT church understood the gospels)
Which includes the novel and unScriptural premise of ensured perpetual magisterial veracity as per Rome, whereby the word of God only authoritatively consists of and means what she asserts, which includes the aforementioned premise.
For Rome has presumed to infallibly declare she is and will be perpetually infallible whenever she speaks in accordance with her infallibly defined (scope and subject-based) formula, which renders her declaration that she is infallible, to be infallible, as well as all else she accordingly declares, and presumes protection from at least salvific error in non-infallible magisterial teaching on faith and morals.