[ebb tide]

Ping

[The Louiswu]

I’m catholic and I don’t care what he thinks. Not My Pope.

[Mark]

bkmk

[mass55th]

Can he provide the definition of a man, and women?

[TangoLimaSierra]

He was heard to say; “Well, I ain’t agin it”.

[GrumpyOldGuy]

ANTI pope. Not the pope. Never has been, never will be. Evil cannot be the Pope.

[for-q-clinton]

He prefers it when it’s a young boy.

[daniel1212]

The principle is the one Pope Francis is referring to when he says that culpability or fault is affected by the context: “one must also consider the circumstances, which may decrease or eliminate fault.” This “elimination of fault” is quite some antidote to the understanding of sin. It might even be thought remove it. The usual way to explain what is meant by “context matters” is to imagine a situation where a child is hungry or starving and he steals a loaf of bread. The injustice and the hunger mitigate the blame for the theft. Maybe they even justify it? Ethicists argue over such (usually hypothetical) things.

Poor analogy, but an adulterer who does not have much of a developed conscience nor moral light but treats his wife and mistresses with kindness is not as evil and culpable as as a PK who abuses his wife, but in no way is either justified.

And unlike killing, stealing (such as in war), homosexual relations are one of the acts that is unconditionally only condemned.

Bergoglio is holding back the sword of Truth (not that he is even qualified to use it) and implicitly helping the homosexual BORG, which insists, "Lower your shields and surrender your mind. We will conform your biological sexual distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.”

[Darksheare]

He’s an antipope, he partakes.

[NWFree]

I have enough sense not to want to know what this slimeball pope thinks

I don’t want to know

Call me when he’s dead