Posted on 12/05/2022 7:17:08 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
Waiting for you to post the texts.
Pure shame that you are without hope. Become Saved and Born Again and maybe you can then recognize Truth.
What text? All the prophets? You want me to post all the prophets?
And I’m still waiting for you to answer the question.
You cling to “... til all be fulfilled,” but you only take half of the statement as true, that being the Law, and then you disregard all being fulfilled in the Prophets.
Which is it, Phil? Did Jesus lie or not?
“Which is it, Phil? Did Jesus lie or not?”
In chess we call this checkmate.
philscultworld doesn’t want the truth, that’s why he continues to post the Margaret McDonald lies as if true. He has been offered the links to show why the stuff about Margaret McDonald is false but he loves the lie because of the spirit that is in him/her/it.
Give him time, he’s consulting other books. Or maybe even conjuring up the (s)pirit of Ellen?
He might just as well call upon Ellen degenerate.
I’ve never even heard of Margaret McDonald. It must be the spouse of ‘Ol McDonald?
Question for phil(istine)
When did the New Testament take effect?
Que the Double Jeopardy theme....
That’s probably what he’s doing: checking SDA Bible Commentary.
I seriously would like to know how they handle it.
Allow me to guide him in his research...
Interesting documentary about the seventh day Adventist cult
And that is the issue. What is the truth? You say you know it, and so do I. One of us is wrong. Your side says that keeping God’s commandments AFTER GRACE isn’t mandatory for Salvation. Your side says that’s legalism. I maintain that I keep God’s commandments out of love for Him and what he did for me on the cross. The message of “if you love me, keep my commandments” is crystal clear. Your side practices LAWLESSNESS. And to those who do, God will say these words...‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you workers of lawlessness!’
Choosing LAWLESSNESS means that you chose poorly.
——>Question for phil(istine)
That’s actually disrespectful, the good Christian that you are. You are making it personal.
It’s haircut time for me, but I’m going to watch it.
——>Not quite sure what you mean. Does this have something to do with literal Israel? If so, state it plainly.
Since you have shown that you DO NOT have the Truth in you, you are incapable of discerning The Truth. And you have a sycophant showing up on this very thread, so your dragging a soul to hell with you is successful! Your father must be so proud.
You are totally misunderstanding what people are saying.
Romans 6:16 says "What then? Shall we sin because we are not under the law but under grace? By no means!"
This means that since we are under Grace, any infraction of the Law does NOT condemn us to death. However we still follow it as much as we can since we do love Him.
——>I’ve never even heard of Margaret McDonald. It must be the spouse of ‘Ol McDonald?
She figures heavily into your false PTR doctrine, and as a member of Edward Irving’s church. See below, starting with Jesuit Futurism (BTW, Tommy Ice also calls the PTR doctrine, Futurism).
Francisco Ribera (Jesuit)
Cardinal Robert Bellarmine (Jesuit)
Michael Walpole (Jesuit)
Manuel De Lacunza (Jesuit)
Edward Irving
MARGARET McDONALD (ecstatic utterances)
Samuel Roffey Maitland
James H. Todd
John Henry Newman
John Nelson Darby
Arno C. Gaebelein
Cyrus Ingerson Scofield
Samuel Untermeyer
Lewis Sperry Chafer
Dallas Theological Seminary is the key place where the Jesuit concepts were taught to thousands of Pastors, including today’s top TV and radio personalities.
Samuel Prideaux Tregelles (attended Irving’s church and eyewitness to Margaret McDonald’s utterances…first time EVER hearing about PTR theory)
http://www.biblelightinfo.com/antichrist.htm
Reading about Margaret McDonald it seems like she was heavily into the occult & had “visions” (from who?) 🤔, sounds like Ellen White after her concussion.
This is exactly why we’re supposed to test the spirits and be Bereans.
—>Question for phil(istine)
That’s actually disrespectful, the good Christian that you are. You are making it personal.
Actually, it became “personal” when you refused to honor my request to QUIT tagging me. But, like a gnat you refused to stop. So if your feelings are hurt, then stop tagging me phil(istine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.