Posted on 10/11/2022 6:45:52 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
“The badgering, taunting, lying, and trying to bully are hallmarks of a reprobate mind.”
Some things never change.
We know that the whore the mystery Babylon is Rome it is as clear as can be. There evidence is so clear that Mr. Mago could see it, but naturally if you do not study or are blinded by the beast to come you will not see it.
Many are blind and since they don’t study or bother with it - well they too shall no see their blindness.
I would say most are willing victims due to their own laziness.
The antiChrist is a man, not an Org, so he rides the ebast of Roamnism but is a descendant of the tribe of Dan. He is empowered by the unrestrained satan ... unrestrained because the Restrainer has been taken out of the way via the departure of ALL those in whom God has been abiding in their born again spirit, both living and deceased members.
——>The antiChrist is a man, not an Org, so he rides the ebast of Roamnism but is a descendant of the tribe of Dan.
Nope. Not what the Reformers ALL believed. People, who believe in this tribe of Dan business and PTR fables, follow Catholic Futurism, now refined into the PTR that it is today. They even say that the “Day of the Lord” and the “Day of Christ” are two separate events. Those are Lucifer-inspired ideas.
The Little Horn (antichrist, man of sin, son of perdition, etc...) comes DIRECTLY out of PAGAN ROME and lasts until the end of the world. It is a RELIGIO-POLITICAL SYSTEM, led by a “MAN”. A single man cannot live thousands of years.
Daniel 7:
8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things.
19Then I would know the truth of the fourth beast, which was diverse from all the others, exceeding dreadful, whose teeth were of iron, and his nails of brass; which devoured, brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with his feet;
20And of the ten horns that were in his head, and of the other which came up, and before whom three fell; even of that horn that had eyes, and a mouth that spake very great things, whose look was more stout than his fellows.
21I beheld, and the same horn made war with the saints, and prevailed against them;
22Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom.
——>He is empowered by the unrestrained satan ... unrestrained because the Restrainer has been taken out of the way via the departure of ALL those in whom God has been abiding in their born again spirit, both living and deceased members.
Nope (again). ECF and Reformers, believed that the RESTRAINER OF THE ANTICHRIST, was PAGAN ROME. The Antichrist power, led by a “MAN”, took power in 538 A.D, and ruled for 1260 “years” until 1798, persecuting the saints, etc... receiving a deadly would, but coming back later (Lateran Treaty) in 1929. “He” will eventually be given his power back to persecute, via help from other kingdoms.
Get thee behind, satan.
Yes--he's been shown a couple of times that EGW was a false "prophetess" yet he refuses to repent.
Nope. You claim, allege, and accuse, not prove. Nowhere near. Your attempts are actually dopey. On the other hand, I have CLEARLY linked the false doctrine PTR to the Antichrist power Catholic church, which you follow as a result. Keep Sunday as your Sabbath? That would also put you under the AUTHORITY of the Antichrist power. Ipso facto, you worship the beast. You are literally one decision away from losing your salvation, that being the Mark of the Beast, if it comes in your lifetime. Same goes for MHG, and maybe even more so, because he TEACHES that it’s ok to break God’s commandments.
389
How do you know what I believe?
That would be news to the 12 disciples.
——>That would be news to the 12 disciples.
No, it wouldn’t. They all kept the 7th day Sabbath, just as Jesus Christ did.
Sunday keeping crept into the church AFTER the apostles, and in fact officially changed as the day of worship by the Catholic church. So, if you keep Sunday as your day of worship, you are under the authority of the Antichrist Power, and ultimately Satan. You do not obey Jesus Christ, who is the author of the law.
Did the Apostles Abandon The Sabbath
And Keep Sunday Instead
To Honor The Resurrection?
http://www.biblelightinfo.com/firstday.htm
John 20:19 and Acts 20:7 disagree with you.
——>John 20:19 and Acts 20:7 disagree with you.
In John 20:19, the disciples were commiserating, HIDING FROM THE JEWS, eating a common meal, not celebrating the new Sabbath. They had no idea that Christ was risen from the dead. (LOL).
http://www.biblelightinfo.com/firstday.htm
The Gospel of John
In the final gospel, dated by Catholic scholars to have been written between 90 and 100 A.D., the testimony on the first day of the week is again a mere two verses:
John 20:1 The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulchre, and seeth the stone taken away from the sepulchre.
John is in complete agreement that the women arrived at the tomb on Sunday, the first day of the week.
John 20:18 Mary Magdalene came and told the disciples that she had seen the Lord, and that he had spoken these things unto her.
John 20:19 Then the same day at evening, being the first day of the week, when the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
John 20:20 And when he had so said, he showed unto them his hands and his side. Then were the disciples glad, when they saw the Lord.
Here we have the first recorded assembly of the disciples on the afternoon of resurrection Sunday. Were they assembled to worship? Were they joyously celebrating the resurrection? No. Until Jesus actually appeared to them they thought He was still dead, despite having been told by Mary Magdalene that she had seen the risen Lord! Until the disciples actually saw Jesus, they did not believe He was risen (Mark 16:14), but upon seeing Him they too believed, and then were glad at His resurrection.
I'm not gonna believe him over Scripture.
——>Acts 20:7
Again, Nope!
http://www.biblelightinfo.com/firstday.htm
The Acts of the Apostles
Here in the second book attributed to Luke, written about 80 - 90 A.D., we now come to one of the most frequently quoted verses to support Sunday sacredness:
Acts 20:7 And upon the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached unto them, ready to depart on the morrow; and continued his speech until midnight.
Clearly the disciples are meeting on Sunday, the first day of the week. It might even be presumed by some that by “breaking bread” they celebrated the Lord’s supper that Sunday. The question that needs to be asked though, is why were the disciples assembled on this day? What reason brought them together? In context, it will be seen that Paul was departing the next day on his journey to Jerusalem to be present during the Pentecost festival (v. 16). This gathering was a farewell assembly with Paul, the last day the people at Troas could meet with him, and that is why it lasted into the early morning hours. In fact Paul talked with them all through the night and then left in the morning at sunrise (v. 11).
Did Paul preach? Yes, without doubt, as verse 7 makes clear. Does that indicate the day was special, a holy day? No, they preached every day:
Acts 5:42 And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.
Did they celebrate the Lord’s supper? Perhaps, yet even if they did, as some maintain, there is no indication that that Sunday, or any Sunday, was being observed as a newly instituted weekly holy day to commemorate the resurrection. The breaking of bread did not indicate a special day of worship, or even that the Lord’s supper was being celebrated, as scripture tells us they met daily and broke bread from house to house:
Acts 2:46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat [food] with gladness and singleness of heart,
This indicates nothing more than eating what are called agape meals of fellowship, which are not necessarily connected with a formal worship service involving partaking in communion. Here is another example of breaking bread meaning a common meal:
Acts 27:33 And while the day was coming on, Paul besought them all to take meat [food], saying, This day is the fourteenth day that ye have tarried and continued fasting, having taken nothing.
Acts 27:34 Wherefore I pray you to take some meat [food]: for this is for your health: for there shall not an hair fall from the head of any of you.
Acts 27:35 And when he had thus spoken, he took bread, and gave thanks to God in presence of them all: and when he had broken it, he began to eat.
Now some will point to the celebration of Pentecost, found in Acts 2, and rightly claim that this occurred on a Sunday. Since that year the 16th of Nisan; the day of firstfruits; which was a type of the resurrection; fell on Sunday, Pentecost would also fall on Sunday. However, those gathered in the upper room on that day were gathered because it was Pentecost, not because it was Sunday:
Acts 2:1 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.
Had they been gathered to observe the resurrection, wouldn’t Luke have told us that this was the new day of the week for all Christians to observe? But, you say, we do observe Pentecost always on a Sunday (Whitsunday). Perhaps you do, but not by anything directed in scripture. Pentecost, like Passover, is not tied to any particular week day. It is determined by the day of the month of the biblical lunar calendar, which means it does not always fall on Sunday. According to the scriptural calculation, Pentecost will most likely be on (or about) the 6th day of the third month, Sivan, which will only occasionally fall on the first day of the week. When the Catholic Church ruled in the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. that the resurrection (Easter) would always be observed on a Sunday (instead of the biblical 16 Nisan), this automatically resulted in Pentecost being observed only on a Sunday, but this change lacks any biblical support.
So, there is nothing in the book of Acts that leads us to believe that Sunday had been set aside as a weekly holy day of worship to honor the resurrection.
Scripture is quoted and the argument is given. It could not be more clear.
Remember, this is a cultist who must twist scripture just as satan tried to do with Jesus. The truth is not in it so don’t expect it to acknowledge the truth. It believes it has a duty to live under the law, in contradiction to Grace. That is a trait shared by all cults because they all reject Grace as satan appeals to their pride of self.
SHOW ME SCRIPTURE that says that God’s holy Sabbath, that He blessed and sanctified (set apart for holy use), that is the 4th commandment, the only commandment that says to remember it, that’s included in the new covenant, was changed. Here’s a clue for you...there isn’t any scripture saying that. Do you know why? BECAUSE ONLY THE LAWGIVER THAT GAVE IT CAN CHANGE IT. And He didn’t. Saying otherwise is dopey.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.