Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Josh Hawley Introduces Measure to Protect Churches, Pregnancy Centers from ‘Radical Activists'
Breitbart ^ | 7/14/22 | Hannah Bleau

Posted on 07/22/2022 6:39:58 PM PDT by marshmallow

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) introduced a measure Thursday designed to protect churches and pregnancy centers from “radical pro-abortion activists” in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade.

The Pregnancy Resource Center Defense Act would essentially strengthen the penalties for attacks on places of worship, as well as pro-life pregnancy centers. According to a summary of the measure from Hawley’s office, the bill would increase criminal penalties “from a misdemeanor to a felony for first-time offenses, and increasing the criminal fine from $10,000 to $25,000” while also increasing the mandatory minimum for arson from five years to seven.

The measure would also ensure that “pregnancy resource centers and religious facilities that successfully sue will receive no less than $20,000,” up from $10,000, according to his office.

“The Biden Administration has turned a blind eye while radical leftists attack pregnancy care centers and houses of worship,” Hawley said in a statement, adding that leftist politicians are “trying to shut them down.”

“It’s time to put an end to the attacks and get tough on thugs who engage in violence, arson, and other means of destruction,” he added.

The measure follows a series of incidents across the country following the leaked draft opinion of the Court overturning Roe v. Wade, which eventually came to fruition. Hawley’s office provided a list of over four dozen examples of violence lodged against these facilities and churches — from someone allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails into Wisconsin Family Action’s facility, to the radical pro-abortion group Jane’s Revenge vandalizing churches, and more:

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: hawley

1 posted on 07/22/2022 6:39:58 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Radical Activists=Communists/Democrats


2 posted on 07/22/2022 6:45:05 PM PDT by EvilCapitalist (81 million votes my ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Josh Hawley Introduces Measure to Protect Churches, Pregnancy Centers from ‘Radical Activists'.

Guns, big ones with lots of ammo....that'll work..

3 posted on 07/22/2022 6:46:10 PM PDT by unread ("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

States are free to pick who they protect or leave to the wolves. Unsure why this is a federal matter, unless for politics.


4 posted on 07/22/2022 7:14:19 PM PDT by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EvilCapitalist

Abortion Terrorists, nothing more nothing less.


5 posted on 07/22/2022 7:21:47 PM PDT by Ponyexpress9790 (Every one that votes democrat is your enemy, there is no co-existing with traitors and terrorists. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Dang wimp!
Call a spade a spade...
Not “radical activists”...

You marshmallow Republicans know that the correct term is “Trotskyite communist”...

Grow a pair!


6 posted on 07/22/2022 7:26:07 PM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

The Democrats and their GOPe flunkies will pull out all the stops to make sure this won’t go anywhere.


7 posted on 07/22/2022 7:40:38 PM PDT by fidelis (👈 Under no obligation to respond to rude, ignorant, abusive, bellicose, and obnoxious posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Yeah, that would really be understandable by middle America...


8 posted on 07/22/2022 7:44:24 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

It’s weird that this wasn’t against the law to begin with? But, but it was probably codified under destruction of property or other statutes.

Or maybe this just carries more weight and here we go again carrying more water for the lowest common denominator.


9 posted on 07/23/2022 1:03:57 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unread

A few angry vets, a few angry congregants, a few sniper emplacements, a few idiots getting shot and this nonsense will come to a screeching halt.


10 posted on 07/23/2022 10:28:49 AM PDT by Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi ( Gen. 12:3: a warning to all antisemites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson