Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: one guy in new jersey
Nobody but a priest with his consecrated hands should be touching the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar with their hands or fingers.

I should also add that I am not an apologist for communion-in-the-paw at all (I think it should be abolished), but I don't believe your statement above was completely true prior to the Council.

Deacons were licit ministers of Holy Communion prior to the Council. They were considered "extraordinary" ministers, but it was permitted for them to be deputized by a priest to distribute the Eucharist. Also -- as far as I have been able to determine -- deacons' hands were not anointed or consecrated during their ordination. (Correct me if I'm wrong on that point; I do not have the 1962 Pontifical Missal and have not found the 1962 rite of diaconal ordination online.)

45 posted on 05/26/2022 8:14:41 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

pre-council, during-council, post-council, regardless of when it was or is done in the modern era, or how, or by the authority of whimsoever, unconsecrated hands touching the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar was, or is, outside of a very narrow set of unusual curcumstances, an abomination, a desecration, and the height of irreverence to God the Son. Protestants love it because Catholics should hate it but many don’t!


48 posted on 05/26/2022 8:36:47 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson