Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DSH
Prager has a high IQ. He's charming and can be convincing. But he's also often astonishingly foolish and naive.

About 20 years ago (Prager must have been around 50), he read a news story about a hit-and-run driver. He was astonished that anyone would hit someone with a car, and then drive off. He didn't understand why someone would behave so immorally.

I was mentally screaming at him, "Because they don't want to get in trouble! They don't want to be sued!"

A listener called up and explained it to Prager.

Prager was amazed, saying, "Oh! That never occurred to me! This is why I love this show. I learn from my listeners."

I never forgot that call. How naive must you be to not know that even ordinary people will run because they don't want to get in trouble?

================

He's said a lot of foolish things over the years. When a Pasadena synagogue hired a tranny rabbi, Prager said he wasn't opposed to a transwoman rabbi, but he was upset that the biologically male rabbi chose to keep his male name, rather than assuming a female name.

Prager said it was "very important" that biologically male "women" present themselves as women, to maintain the gender distinction, because ... the Bible.

Prager has compromised so much, he now accepts trannies, so long as they "present themselves" as their chosen gender. That's what's "very important."

=================

Prager said that we should use people's preferred pronouns because its "a courtesy." And for that biologically male "women" should not compete in women's sports, "as a courtesy" to biologically female women.

Prager is astonishingly foolish and naive. Like many "tough talking" cuckservatives, he's compromised with the Left his entire life. He keeps drawing new lines in the sand, boldly asserting that this one the Left shall not cross, this one he shall not compromise on.

14 posted on 03/19/2022 10:58:38 AM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Angelino97; DSH

The problem with this discussion is that everyone is commenting on what Dennis has said previously. So it’s devolved into a personal attack on his character rather than a discussion of his actual religious beliefs as an “Observant Jew.”

In other words we are now at post 14 and there are a lot of attacks on Prager’s politics but not much on the issues of the video. The video was to let a Jew and a Gentile tell the world what they believe and why.

I think when you listen to what Dennis says about his religious views, it might explain some of his rather inconsistent political views. It was enlightening to me.

Also catch his reactions when Jack Hibbs uses the Old Testsment to show exactly what Jack Hibbs believes and why. Watch the video and then let us know your reaction.

I’d like to get comments on the video and not what either of these guys have said or done in the past.

Thanks.


15 posted on 03/19/2022 11:23:03 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson