[Catholic Caucus] Francis Removes a 57-year-old American Bishop Named by Benedict XVI with no Explanation

Rorate Caeli ^ | March 9, 2022 | New Catholic

[ebb tide]

[Catholic Caucus] Francis Removes a 57-year-old American Bishop Named by Benedict XVI with no Explanation

For a bishop named in 2010, and now very healthy and still only 57, to be removed, there must be a serious reason. Abuse? Cover-up? Embezzling?

Yet the bishop of Arecibo (Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, United States), Chicago native Daniel Fernández Torres, was simply removed by Francis today, after being ordered by the Vatican to resign.

You will find several explanations online -- that he was supportive of religious objections to COVID vaccines; that he was "conservative"; that he was not very well liked by his fellow bishops in the island. 

We asked for information on Twitter before saying anything -- sometimes, there is a deeper surprise, often unpleasant. But there really does not seem to be one this time. So, unless a very clear answer from the Vatican comes about, this seems a clear case of Franciscan tyrannical injustice. When an abuser, such as his friend Zanchetta, was in trouble, Francis promoted him to protect him; when a bishop does nothing serious, and is simply disliked, he's called upon to resign; and, when he refuses, he's simply removed.

That of course cannot stand. It is not how the Church is constituted. The episcopal office is not a subsidiary of a petty Roman dictator.

*

Below, the bishop's explanation, in English:

Communications Office 

Diocese of Arecibo 

 PRESS RELEASE 

 Statement by Bishop Daniel Fernández Torres 

TO THE PEOPLE OF GOD WHO ARE PILGRIMS IN THE DIOCESE OF ARECIBO 

 When you receive the news of my replacement as bishop at the head of the Diocese of Arecibo, I want you to know that it is not up to me to explain to you a decision that I cannot explain to myself, although I accept it with the patience of Christ for the good of the Church. Nor is it up to you to judge what only God and history will do at the proper time. 

 In reacting to what has happened, I feel blessed to suffer persecution and slander (cf. Mt 5:10-11) for proclaiming the truth of man's dignity in circumstances like the present in which "it is uncomfortable: it is opposed to our actions..." (Wis 2:12). (Wis 2:12). 

Today I can hold my head up high and, even though I am imperfect and a sinner, know that I have done the right thing, and this gives me great inner peace. I am also comforted by the Hebrew meaning of the name Daniel, which I providentially received at my baptism, "God is my judge". 

 I regret very much that in the Church where mercy is so much preached, in practice some lack a minimum sense of justice. No process has been made against me, nor have I been formally accused of anything and simply one day the Apostolic Delegate verbally communicated to me that Rome was asking me to resign. A successor of the apostles is now being replaced without even undertaking what would be a due canonical process to remove a parish priest. 

 I was informed that I had committed no crime but that I supposedly "had not been obedient to the Pope nor had I been in sufficient communion with my brother bishops of Puerto Rico." It was suggested to me that if I resigned from the diocese I would remain at the service of the Church in case at some point I was needed in some other position; an offer that in fact proves my innocence. However, I did not resign because I did not want to become an accomplice of a totally unjust action and that even now I am reluctant to think that it could happen in our Church. 

 This personal experience, on the other hand, has helped me to realize in a new way the grave responsibility that all of us bishops have in the governance of the Church, which is apostolic and not pyramidal, synodal and not autocratic. I believe that for quite some time many of us bishops have been watching with concern what is happening in the Church and have been reluctant to believe what is happening. Today more than ever we must remember our call to be prophets.

These are difficult times, but let us not lose hope. 

The words of Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI, when he was a priest, can encourage us: "It seems to me certain that very difficult times await the Church. Her real crisis has barely begun. We have to reckon with strong shocks. But I am also absolutely certain of what will remain in the end: not the Church of political worship, already without soul, but the Church of faith. It will certainly never again be the dominant force in society to the extent that it was until recently. But it will flourish again and become visible to human beings as the homeland that gives them life and hope beyond death." 

 I humbly celebrate what we have been able to do together from the Diocese of Arecibo, in these almost twelve years, in youth and vocational ministry, in the struggle for the dignity of human love, the family and respect for life, in the freedom of the Church against political interference, in the formation of holy priests and in having given a "House" to the Virgin in our diocesan Shrine. 

If by trying to be faithful to God I am replaced in office, it is worth it, because as a bishop I can be useful to the Church with my own witness. I remember the words of St. John of Avila: "how honored we are to be dishonored by seeking the honor of God".

I manifest my communion in the Catholic faith, with the Pope and my brothers in the episcopate, despite my perplexity in the face of an incomprehensible arbitrariness. And if, from now on, I can be of any service to you, I declare my full availability. 

 Today and always my greatest gratitude to God and to Our Lady of Perpetual Help, our patroness. Thanks also to all the priests for being good and faithful clergy. Thanks to all the faithful of my beloved diocese of Arecibo for your love and prayers. Thanks to all the staff of the bishopric for being an extended family. Thanks to my family for their unconditional support always. Thanks also to my brothers and sisters of different Christian denominations for the times when together we raised our voices in defense of the family. 

 God bless you all. 

 In Christ dead and risen, 

+Daniel

[In Spanish]

[Robert A Cook PE]

Something is hidden. Deeply hidden.

[SuperLuminal]

Just like in our country, the communist purge, worldwide, continues to grow exponentially...

[dangus]

Read this in horrifying contrast to the open heresy of the German bishops, the homoeroticism defiling the mass in Austria, and the fight-to-the-last-breath, illicit defense of the Argentine bishop Gustavo Zenchetto, an outrageous pervert who molested his seminarians and was flat-busted with phone porn of them.

[dangus]

Found some background:

“In 2014, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith announced that it had conducted an investigation into complaints of sexual against Fernandez and dismissed the case. Fernandez had said the complaints were motivated by opposition to his pursuit of priests accused on sexual abuse. By then he had removed six of his priests from active ministry.

“In July 2018, Cardinal Fernando Filoni, prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, appointed Fernandez to a five-year term as director of the Pontifical Mission Societies in Puerto Rico.

“Fernandez refused to send seminarians from his diocese to the Interdiocesan Seminary of Puerto Rico when it was approved by the Vatican in March 2020.

“He also refused to sign a joint statement of Puerto Rico’s bishops on August 24, 2021, that told Catholics they had a duty to be vaccinated against Covid-19. The bishops said they did “not see how a conscientious objection can be invoked from Catholic morality” against the vaccination program, while Fernandez took the position that a Catholic could have a conscientious objection to compulsory vaccination[...]

“He said he was told he “had not been obedient to the pope nor ... in sufficient communion with my brother bishops of Puerto Rico”.

So sacked for not allowing Catholics to exercise freedom of conscience regarding vaccines?

[hoosierham]

The current occupant of Peter’s Chair perhaps should have taken Judas as his name.

[ebb tide]

Not to mention, Bergoglio’s refusal of Marx’s offer of resignation.

[dangus]

Not sure if he is an antipope. Benedict seems to think he’s still A pope. Since you can only have one, the obvious conclusion is that he is THE pope, since a pope has to willingly renounce the office to actually no longer hold the office. If he doesnt know he’s renounced it, he can’t have willingly left it.

[LumberJack53213]

They were gunning for him. He objected to “gender ideology,” refused to close the diocesan seminary and send his men to the new inter-diocesan (liberal indoctrination) seminary, and defended invoking the right of conscience to reject the vaccine.

[TTFX]

Do you remember when Bergoglio said, who am I to judge?

He is so petty he reacts uncontrollably over a minor disagreement about a personal decision. What an embarrassment.

[MDLION]

A Pfizer firing?