Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

I DON’T KNOW HOW THE ARTICLE GOT CUT, IT LOOKED GOOD IN THE PREVIEW, BUT HERE IS THE REST OF THE ARTICLE:

In stark contrast, Old Testament and Semitic scholar Michael S. Heiser tweeted, “The idea that Ezekiel 38 and 39 is about Russia or a Russian invasion has literally no merit in terms of exegesis.” (Exegesis refers to accurate interpretation of the Scriptures.)

Who is right here?

Dr. Heiser, without a doubt.

Allow me to explain.

First, Ezekiel 38 says nothing about Russia, directly or indirectly, despite some translations which read, “Son of man [which is how the Lord referred to Ezekiel], set thy face toward Gog, of the land of Magog, the prince of Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him” (ASV, my emphasis; see also the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament which dates to approximately two hundred years before Jesus).

The correct translation, as recognized by the vast majority of translations and commentaries, is this: “Son of man, set your face toward Gog, of the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him” (ESV).

The Hebrew here reads n’si rosh, which could potentially mean “the prince of Rosh” (as if rosh was a place name) but it is better translated as “chief prince” (with rosh carrying its normal meaning of “head, chief”).

Yet even if a case could be made for the Hebrew text meaning, “prince of Rosh,” Ezekiel scholar Daniel Block points out the problems. (This will be a little technical for some readers, but just watch for his conclusions.)

He writest, “The popular identification of Rosh with Russia is impossibly anachronistic and based on a faulty etymology, the assonantal similarities between Russia and Rosh being purely accidental. In the 19th century some scholars associated Rosh with Ru^s, a Scythian tribe inhabiting the northern Taurus Mountains, according to Byzantine and Arabic writings. Recent attempts to equate Rosh with Râshu/ Rêshu/Arashi in neo-Assyrian annals are more credible, except that the place so named was located far to the east on the border between Babylon and Elam, and would have had nothing to do with Meshech and Tubal. This interpretation is also difficult (though not impossible) from a grammatical point of view. If Rosh is to be read as the first in a series of names, the conjunction should precede ‘Meshech.’ ro¯?s? is therefore best understood as a common noun, appositional to and offering a closer definition of na¯s´i^?. Accordingly, the prince, chief of Meshech and Tubal, combines Ezekiel’s preferred title for kings with a hierarchical designation, the addition serving to clarify the preceding archaic term. Ezekiel’s point is that Gog is not just one of many Anatolian princely figures, but the leader among princes and over several tribal/national groups.” (New International Commentary on the Old Testament, Ezekiel 25-48, 434-435).

Second, Meshech and Tubal referred to nations that were located in what is Turkey today, hence also unrelated to the current war.

Of course, the argument is that the war will expand, involving many other nations, some of which are mentioned in Ezekiel 38:5-6. And I personally believe that the Bible does predict a final war against Israel, one in which the Lord will fight for His ancient people and ultimately destroy the invaders. This is most clearly addressed in Zechariah 12 and 14, as well as in Ezekiel 38-39.

I believe that this will literally happen, just as I believe that the Bible prophesied that God would scatter the Jewish people around the world (I write this as a Jesus-believing Jewish person myself) and then regather us back to our ancient homeland. As it was written, so has it happened.

And Ezekiel’s language is very clear, saying to these nations, “After a long time you shall be summoned; in the distant future you shall march against the land [of a people] restored from the sword, gathered from the midst of many peoples—against the mountains of Israel, which have long lain desolate—[a people] liberated from the nations, and now all dwelling secure” (NJPS Version). This is quite a striking prophecy!

But there is no evidence that Russia’s current invasion is related to these words, nor is there any evidence that Russia is mentioned or alluded to in these chapters.

What about a Jewish tradition that purportedly states, “When you hear that the Russians have captured the city of Crimea, you should know that the times of the Messiah have started, that his steps are being heard. And when you hear that the Russians have reached the city of Constantinople (today’s Istanbul), you should put on your Shabbat [Sabbath] clothes and don’t take them off because it means that the Messiah is about to come any minute.”

It is just that: a tradition, without scriptural support or divine authority. Plus, the Russians have not yet reached Istanbul. Not even faintly, remotely close.

Could it be that, in the years to come, we will see a coalition of nations coming against Israel, with Russia leading the way (or, at least, participating)? That’s possible. And could it be that, when that day arrives, we will look back to Ezekiel 38-39, at least as a broad-brushed description of what is taking place? Perhaps.

But right now, there is absolutely no scriptural or factual evidence that connects Ezekiel 38 to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. And with hundreds (or thousands) of mistaken date-setting interpretations of the Bible littering our recent past, it’s best to toss this latest one in the dustbin right now.


2 posted on 03/06/2022 9:46:15 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

No, Ezy was not even concerned with dick swinging in 2022


3 posted on 03/06/2022 9:49:01 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Turkey is more likely a candidate. Don’t see what motivation Russia would have to invade israel. Zechariah 5 talks about a flying roll that others have said has dimensions akin to an icbm. The roll carries a curse that ‘covers the whole land’ a rare expresion in the Bible, one of which is found in Daniel in relation to Persia. It starts fires.
In the same chapter he talks about a woman in a basket that has a lead cover. It is carried through the air by two winged creaturers and set down in what is now Iraq. As hebrew had no vowels the hebrew word for woman and ‘fire’ could be easily confused. Joel talks about palm tree shaped clouds. We have a name for them too. Mushroom clouds. Erdogan wants to invigorate the Turkish sultanate. Uniting Turkish speaking peoples. Uttermost parts of the north. The Eurasian steppe. uzbeks,turkmen etc. Mohommedans


7 posted on 03/06/2022 10:20:02 PM PST by Long Jon No Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Gomer and cohorts, in Ezekiel 38:6, seem to get left out when this is discussed.

In Genesis 10:3, the descendants of Gomer are Ashkenaz (obviously Germany), Riphath (likely Gaul or France), and Togarmah (?Turkey). Is that a reference to NATO?

Doesn’t fit some preconceptions, I know.


9 posted on 03/06/2022 11:05:29 PM PST by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Greek historian, Herodotus, identified the land of Magog as that of the Scythians, ancestors of the Russians. Roman historian, Flavius Josephus, who lived shortly after the time of Christ, identified Magog as the land we know today as Russia. Throughout the centuries, scholars have identified Magog as Russia, due north of Israel. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica associates Russia with this land.

Greek historian, Herodotus, identified the land of Magog as that of the Scythians, ancestors of the Russians. Roman historian, Flavius Josephus, who lived shortly after the time of Christ, identified Magog as the land we know today as Russia. Throughout the centuries, scholars have identified Magog as Russia, due north of Israel. Even the Encyclopedia Britannica associates Russia with this land.
19 posted on 03/07/2022 4:24:25 AM PST by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The prince of Meshech is literally the prince of Rosh, from which we get the word “Russia.” Meshech is the ancient name for Moscow; Tubal the ancient name for Tubalsk, both key cities in the history of Russia.


20 posted on 03/07/2022 4:26:15 AM PST by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson