LOL!
Page 17
Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ellen G. White was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy.
By:_______________________
Vincent L. Ramik
VLR/skl
https://whiteestate.org/legacy/issues-ramik-html/
Oh hey, lookit Phil waving around his double standards again!
In Phil world, non SDAs are guilty and can’t be proven innocent.
But EGW is innocent even when proven guilty.
In Phil’s world, statements made by family lawyers are standards of proof now, are they?
I guess that makes Ravi innocent and Phil a repeated liar then, as judged by his own standards.
—> LOL!
Any post that you’ve made that starts with LOL! Goes on to prevaricate, obfuscate , or equivocate.
Again today!
Page 17
Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the actions of Ravi Zacharias were conclusively and conclusively platonic.
CONCLUSIONS:
Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ravi Zacharias was not involved in sexual immorality and his conduct did not constitute abuse of any kind.
By:_______________________
Vincent L. Ramik
Falseworld Legal Services, LLC
VLR/skl