To: MHGinTN
No, what you describe sounds more like Calvinism to me...
Do you feel Calvinists are demonic then along that line of thinking?
"Lordy, Lordy," are you suggesting Universalism then as an answer?
You know the doctrine of Invincible ignorance.
The Church, even before Vat 2 rejected the exclusionism you are incorrectly ascribing to me...
Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus though still valid, now understands an application of possible exceptions by extraordinary means- that has to take into account an evolving understanding of what Salvation can mean for those rejecting the Sacramental Graces. Tha gets complicated by modernism - and would require a case x case understanding... not for me...
But, "Lord, Lord" why chance it?....
1,167 posted on
03/30/2022 10:38:36 AM PDT by
MurphsLaw
(+++11"How is it you don’t understand that I was not talking to you about bread?"+++)
To: MurphsLaw
Could you please show us where in Scripture the terms * Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus * and * Invincible Ignorance * are found?
1,173 posted on
03/30/2022 11:24:21 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
To: MurphsLaw
"...for those rejecting the sacramental gracesmanufactured traditions of men seeking to empower their priesthood by 'borrowing' and redefining.
1,176 posted on
03/30/2022 12:28:39 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
To: MurphsLaw
Dp you really imagine I would endorse a false assertion by you? You miss characterize what I wrote as ‘sounding more like Calvinism’ to you, then expect me to endorse that erroneous thought by using it to reason an issue you promote? I washed my hands of you once. Silly of me to entertain your twisted reasoning once again.
1,177 posted on
03/30/2022 2:34:13 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson