STOP IT!!!
All of you.
Playgrounds at recess have better interaction between supposedly rational human beings than the last 100-200 replies in this thread.
Is 
all you've got left??
| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 04/24/2022 5:40:39 AM PDT by Religion Moderator, reason:
Childishness |
Posted on 03/06/2022 11:16:06 AM PST by CharlesOConnell
No, because your religion was founded by and follows as an authority a false prophet who was a spirit medium.
Because your false religion uses her writings as an authority over the Scriptures…
And because of the heresy it teaches.
YOU say, and also completely untrue. I could sense your frustration in not being able to pin a plagiarism on EGW. It was hilarious to witness. So, you move on to other accusations. Typical of your false religion.
Stumbled on this post and wanted to save it,,,
Seems I stepped in a pile
Of “Pope” with one.
Cheers
Phil, luircin provided documented links to her theft.
You’ve not even scratched the surface.
And already we know the lady was a false prophet and a thief.
In fact you’ve yet to refute a single point, nor to document any of your own.
I’m not surprised you are unable to see it.
—> could sense your frustration
Both false and against religion forum rules to read minds.
Good,,,
—> could sense your frustration
Both false and against religion forum rules to read minds.
Yeah, it would be if I said anything to indicate that I was reading your mind, which I didn’t.
——>In fact you’ve yet to refute a single point, nor to document any of your own.
So sad...
Opinion:
Ramik was given all the allegations of plagiarism from the first raised in 1889 to 1981.
“Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ellen G. White was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy.” (Adventist Review, Sept. 17, 1981)
“Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic.” (Ibid)
And, I note, won’t even respond directly to me any more, much like the local Catholics refuse to do so.
I guess my points are just irrefutable.
(And blessed am I when people speak evil about me on account of the name of Christ, even behind my back.)
Phil? Posting the ‘opinion’ of someone paid to have that opinion is the opposite of proof.
That's lawyers for ya. They always want to get paid. I haven't met one yet that takes every case for free.
"In 1981 the church hired copyright attorney Vincent L. Ramik of the law firm Diller, Ramik and Wight to examine Ellen White's writings and present them with HIS conclusions".
Nevertheless, after more than 300 hours of researching approximately 1,000 relevant cases in American legal history, Ramik's conclusions were as follows:
"Based upon our review of the facts and legal precedents, we conclude that Ellen G. White was not a plagiarist and her works did not constitute copyright infringement/piracy." (Adventist Review, Sept. 17, 1981)
"Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic." (Ibid)
Which post contains the links you provided?
Oh hey, lookit the delaying tactic from ole Phil.
https://nonsda.org/egw/plagiarism.html
Here you go, a nice little index of 33 links proving EGW’s sin. Posted for the second time!
So all I need to do is find a lawyer who sometime in the past said that Ravi is innocent and that makes it true?
Phil World logic at its finest!
I LOVE the logic of Phil World! It means that there really IS a tribe of Native Americans that are actually human/dragon hybrids!
And OJ’s wife really was murdered by another mysterious killer that’s on a golf course somewhere!
And you can remove the brain from a body in mid autopsy and the body will still be alive!
And men can have a uterus!
After all, a lawyer said it, so it must be true!
——>So all I need to do is find a lawyer who sometime in the past said that Ravi is innocent and that makes it true?
Do you know of any? Don’t think you would find any now after the Miller & Martin investigation results. And, try to convince them to do, say 300 hours or so, of their own investigation, and pay them nothing. See how that would go over. Oh, and make sure it’s a top criminal lawyer. Go...
A nice little index of WHAT, EGW haters? Are any of these people EXPERTS in determining plagiarism, such as specialists in patent, trademark, and copyright law? Why don’t you narrow down the list to EXPERTS. Go...
Is all you've got left??
STOP IT!!!
All of you.
Playgrounds at recess have better interaction between supposedly rational human beings than the last 100-200 replies in this thread.
Does that include your posts?
STOP IT!!!
All of you... = Philsworld?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.