Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

But in April 2000, when a U.S. bishop did restrict some use of the ad orientem posture in his diocese, the Congregation for Divine Worship reportedly clarified by letter that Mass could be celebrated in either the versus populum or ad orientem position, stating that “both positions are in accord with liturgical law; both are to be considered correct.”

“As both positions enjoy the favor of the law, the legislation may not be invoked to say that one position or the other accords more closely with the mind of the Church,” the congregation added.


1 posted on 01/29/2022 12:01:20 PM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 01/29/2022 12:01:49 PM PST by ebb tide (Where are the good fruits of the Second Vatican Council? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide
The official translation of that text, in a discussion of the placement of the altar within a church, says in #299 that “the altar should be built apart from the wall, in such a way that it is possible to walk around it easily and that Mass can be celebrated at it facing the people, which is desirable wherever possible.”

The Vatican, who ought to know, as well as several competent Latinists, have already explained that that "official" translation is absolutely wrong.

4 posted on 01/29/2022 1:16:46 PM PST by Campion (NO Wag-the-Dog WARS for Big Guy Brandon's 10%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson