Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Finally, such a process of liturgical mutation would be gravely damaging for a significant number of the faithful. Already they do not understand the restrictions placed on the celebration of the traditional Mass. Their distress at the loss of a liturgy that nourishes their interior life would be immense. And how could they stand by and watch hundreds of priests, religious men and women, and seminarians who—with clear consciences and based on the word of previous pontiffs—have remained faithful to the Catholic hierarchy for thirty-three years, sometimes at great sacrifice, being treated in this way?
1 posted on 12/24/2021 6:44:08 AM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 12/24/2021 6:44:49 AM PST by ebb tide (Where are the good fruits of the Second Vatican Council? Anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

The way the author responded to Francis’ dictate forcibly reminded me of the way Red China treated Hong Kong. One Country, Two Systems for 50 years, until the Hong Kong way was showing up the Commie China Way in about the same time frame.


3 posted on 12/24/2021 6:55:15 AM PST by Dr. Sivana ("There are only men and women."-- George Gilder, Sexual Suicide, 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ebb tide

Excellent, the vows were made to the office of the Holy See not a particular office holder.


5 posted on 12/24/2021 7:21:03 AM PST by FranklinsTower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson