She writes: “Msgr. Gamber, a prominent figure, affirmed this with vigor after the new Missal’s entry into force. “The new liturgy is a ritus modernus, (modern rite),” he declared, “and no longer a ritus romanus (Roman rite).”
“Fr. Louis Bouyer, member of the Liturgical Movement, who on the whole was favorable towards conciliar innovations, was forced to affirm: “We must speak clearly: today there no longer exists in practice, within the Catholic Church, a liturgy worthy of the name.”
“The Reformed Missal was a catastrophe at all levels: liturgical, dogmatic, and moral. The result, obvious to everyone, is that it has emptied churches, convents, and seminaries. Unable to impose it by the force of tradition, which it does not convey, they seek to impose it by law.”
“However, this is an uncertain operation, based on deception and therefore doomed to fail. This is not a fatal blow to the Roman rite, but the euthanasia of the modern rite.”
“It is not really a blow causing an irreversible effect, but a vivifying sizing up of the Missal of St. Pius V which - because of the hatred it arouses among the modernist fringes of the hierarchy - is confirmed as ‘the most beautiful thing this side of heaven’ which was transmitted to us by our fathers and which we will transmit to our children, even if we have to bathe it with our blood to do so.”
Yee-hah! She is a good-ole girl!
She's absolutely right. The Novus Order is said well by many holy priests because in most circumstances they must. But except in their hands, it transmits no holy inspiration and produces no children. As you look around the church and compare what and whom you see at each form of the Mass, the "New" Mass of a half-century ago is at the end of its road.
The 1960's called--and actually they don't want their Mass back.
It's all over but the whining from Francis and his envious friends. Pray for them, they need it. And let the saints go marching in.