[MurphsLaw]

No we call that - misguided Christianity- plain and simple...

Think of a country- whose constitutional from of government is based on the basic liberty of all humans and their inherited unalienable rights.
Now think of a person who would say that killing the unborn does not violate that constitutional right as the unborn is not a person yet. Thats a gross misrepresentation of principle - borne out of nothing but relativism. No reason of precedent required - no documents just pure ideology.

No while your Pope Francis has on many occasions supported the unborn- though never reaches the antagonism of other ideals he espouses- he's smart enough to realize he cannot present his own ideology without misrepresenting a document as an instrument to legit1mize said ideals.

Nutshell: HE is making his own fruit... in the sacred garden... Woe to those who eat of it some of it...
(ie. Woe to you, Bethsaida!)

[ebb tide]

No we call that - misguided Christianity- plain and simple...

You and your ilk can call it a silk purse, for all I care, Murph.

I'll call it for what it is: a sow's ear.