The group went on to criticize those moralists who propose applying the now popular principle of remote material cooperation to abortion-tainted vaccines, mitigating the level of complicity one would have today with the evil of an abortion procured at some point in history. The authors questioned the criteria used to determine how long ago an abortion must be before it can be considered “remote,” particularly when the cells from that child are replicated even now and have been “manipulated deliberately” for the “depraved intention” to create cell lines.Next we'll see an excuse for Adam and Eve's orginal sin, due to our remote cooperation. Thus; no need for baptism or belief in Jesus Christ.
1 posted on
03/11/2021 9:07:49 PM PST by
ebb tide
To: Al Hitan; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...
2 posted on
03/11/2021 9:08:36 PM PST by
ebb tide
To: ebb tide
I have sympathy for this view.
If large groups of folks (say half the Roman Catholics and half us evangelicals) refused to take vaccines that utilized murdered children they would probably stop using those babies’ cell lines and rightly so.
3 posted on
03/11/2021 9:17:56 PM PST by
Persevero
(I am afraid propriety has been set at naught. - Jane Austen )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson