By law, they should be.
Case in point. In one organization I volunteer for, we had an allegation come up. We immediately activated our response plan, started a time line and investigation, and contacted our third party investigation firm that there maybe an issue.
As part of the immediate investigation and interview with impacted parties, it was not as it was presented to be. We filed the investigation and quietly closed it. The accuser had a history of do such things, and the time line was such that they were not in a position to be contacted by the accused when they said they were.
You know why we act that way? 25 years ago there was an accusation by a person of “questionable” standing that was not handled at all. It was assumed they were making it up.
They weren’t. I wasn’t part of the organization at the time, but it almost destroyed it.
In a setting like RZIM you have to be at least as aggressive in investigating as we are, and to be honest that is why you have a board over such ministries. The devil is very good at tempting people at their weak points, and if Ravi was getting private massages by young women that is a near occasion to sin and explicitly something our organization would NOT allow (the Pence rule).
The Catholic church and Boy Scouts ignored “billions” of allegations, and look where it got them.
You lead the "every accusation" (by false witnesses) needs to be investigated promptly group. I'll say, well let's see who's accusing, and who is being accused.
And don't watch CNN.