Of course I don't. Perhaps "bad title" was not appropriate. Maybe..."The Bible In Paintings, #123: A Visual Tour Of Solomon's Most Famous Decree" would fill the bill?
I am being deliberately provocative, in my own unique way, in order to advance the Gospel. It was a joke. In a title, designed to generate a response: "Everyone already knows Solomon did not in fact divide the child, so why is this fool claiming he did? I'd better see."
I expect, Sam, that you have a true zeal for the Gospel. So do I. That's why I do this. By the way, Part 3's title tomorrow will be the same.
So, any comments about the art, or fresh new insights into the text it may have inspired in you?