Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Short essay explains bishops’ complicity in the creation of ‘the most anti-Catholic party in modern history’
LifeSite News ^ | November 4, 2020 | Mary Werbaneth

Posted on 11/05/2020 11:45:40 AM PST by ebb tide

Short essay explains bishops’ complicity in the creation of ‘the most anti-Catholic party in modern history’

America is at a stage in history where there are 'more Catholics in public service, but less Catholic influence over public life, than ever before.'

WASHINGTON, D.C., November 4, 2020 (LifeSiteNews How did the pro-abortion Democrat Party, which boasts numerous Catholic members including presidential candidate Joe Biden, turn into one of the most anti-Catholic organizations in the country?  

In a new essay at The Federalist, Christopher Bedford points the finger at the Catholic Church: “Through 2020’s disease, uncertainty, government power over religion, and attacks on saints and churches, our bishops have chosen the path of secular popularity.”

Biden, for example, is “pro-late-term abortion, pro-child sex-change, pro-gay marriage, pro-contraception,” Bedford wrote, all in direct contradiction to Church teaching, and “Biden chose Sen. Kamala Harris as his running mate, despite her claim that membership in a Catholic organization is a disqualifier from becoming a federal judge.” 

Yet, America is at a stage in history where there are “more Catholics in public service, but less Catholic influence over public life, than ever before.” Long gone are the days of a Democratic pro-life Bob Casey or young Ted Kennedy. 

Today, the Catholic bishops in this country “dared not utter a word of criticism” against Biden, and some even supported him. Some tried to silence those who did speak out against Biden, as was the case with Father James Altman.  

“Of the entire American Catholic Church’s leadership, only Bishop Joseph Strickland spoke out on the Biden campaign’s open assault on Catholic moral teaching, Bedford noted. 

Many people trace the beginning of the bishops skirting “their role in public life, leaving the faithful to fend for themselves,” to September 1960. That was when Senator John F. Kennedy now famously spoke to a group of Protestant ministers and said that “no man of God” will advise his actions on issues as varied as public funding for Catholic schools, birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling, etc.  

Bedford argued that Kennedy’s speech “went a long way toward ingratiating American Catholics into elite society acceptance,” but that Kennedy “achieved this not by embracing his faith, but by shedding it.” Few, if any, bishops spoke out at that time. Perhaps their desire to see the first Catholic become president was too much of a temptation for them to resist. 

Bedford quoted Pope Benedict XVI, who said, “The church is not a political power. It’s not a party, but a moral power.” The bishops, for the most part, are unwilling to assert that moral power, especially regarding this presidential election. Bedford concluded: 

Kennedy said he believes “in an America... where there is no Catholic vote, no anti-Catholic vote.” With the willing assistance of the bishops, he got his first wish. Now, through their folly, the bishops have ensured they’ll have no say against the second.  



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: abortion; bidenvoters; democrats; socialists; usscb

1 posted on 11/05/2020 11:45:40 AM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Coleus; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 11/05/2020 11:46:54 AM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
I disagree with the author. I would point rather to Vatican II, the homosexual infiltration of the Church, and the Johnson administration forbidding churches from commenting on political questions. I do agree it was the bishops in the past as well as most of the current ones who are hirelings, not shepherds.
3 posted on 11/05/2020 12:58:33 PM PST by dominic flandry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

The Church and its so called Pope has lost me when the Homily began to include globull warming and other instances of “social justice”.


4 posted on 11/05/2020 1:28:38 PM PST by Finatic (Sometimes I think it would be nice to just get it on and get it over with. Once and for all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
20 But I have this against you, that you tolerate the woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and leads My bond-servants astray so that they commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols.

21 I gave her time to repent, and she does not want to repent of her sexual immorality.

22 Behold, I will throw her on a bed of sickness, and those who commit adultery with her into great tribulation, unless they repent of her deeds.

23 And I will kill her children with plague, and all the churches will know that I am He who searches the minds and hearts; and I will give to each one of you according to your deeds.

5 posted on 11/05/2020 2:26:31 PM PST by MAAG (Tetelestai, paid in full. You are as righteous as God is. Double jeopardy is forbidden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson