Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Fratelli Tutti’ Restates Pope’s Progressivism
Church Militant ^ | October 4, 2020 | Jules Gomes

Posted on 10/04/2020 4:50:35 PM PDT by ebb tide

‘Fratelli Tutti’ Restates Pope’s Progressivism

Encyclical commends Gandhi, King, Tutu and Imam Ahmed al-Tayyeb

VATICAN CITY (ChurchMilitant.com) - In his longest encyclical yet, offering "a new vision of fraternity," Pope Francis restates his frequently repeated pronouncements on migration, markets, media, interfaith dialogue, populism, nationalism, redistribution of wealth and the death penalty.  

Image
A masked panel introduces Fratelli Tutti to the media

Extensively citing his controversial "Human Fraternity" covenant with Grand Imam Ahmed al-Tayyeb and naming the Sunni leader five times in his encyclical Fratelli Tutti ("Brothers All"), Francis quotes the Qur'an affirming: "Whoever kills a person is like one who kills the whole of humanity, and whoever saves a person is like one who saves the whole of humanity" (cf. Surah 5:32).

The 45,000-word document, released Sunday, is "addressed to all people of good will, regardless of their religious convictions," and commends as inspirations for universal fraternity "brothers and sisters who are not Catholics: Martin Luther King, Desmond Tutu, Mahatma Gandhi and many more."

Francis reminds readers that the words "Fratelli Tutti" are taken from the sixth of 28 admonitions of St. Francis of Assisi to his brother friars focusing on the 25th admonition to love and fear one's brother "as much when he is far from him as he would when with him."

Introducing his encyclical with the paradigm of St. Francis of Assisi's visit to Sultan Malik-el-Kamil in Egypt during the fifth crusade (1219), the pontiff argues that St. Francis did not intend to convert Muslims to Islam but to express "fraternal openness" and to inspire "the vision of a fraternal society."

"A journey of peace is possible between religions," and while "at times fundamentalist violence is unleashed in some groups, of whatever religion, by the rashness of their leaders," yet, "the commandment of peace is inscribed in the depths of the religious traditions that we represent," says Pope Francis, speaking on behalf of other religions.

Today we state clearly that 'the death penalty is inadmissible' and the Church is firmly committed to calling for its abolition worldwide.Tweet

Religious violence, Francis asserts, comes as a result of "a deviation from religious teachings" and "a political manipulation of religions" and even Christians can engage in "destructive forms of fanaticism" and "be caught up in networks of verbal violence" on the internet, while for certain Catholic media "limits can be overstepped, defamation and slander can become commonplace, and all ethical standards and respect for the good name of others can be abandoned."

"How can this contribute to the fraternity that our common Father asks of us?" he asks, blasting "digital campaigns of hatred and destruction" and maintaining that "digital connectivity is not enough to build bridges" or unite humanity.  


 

Francis is disturbed by "shattered dreams" of a "unified Europe" which had kindled hopes for an integrated world. The pontiff laments a "certain regression" into "a myopic, extremist, resentful and aggressive nationalism."

Without naming political leaders or nations, the pope condemns "those who appear to feel encouraged or at least permitted by their faith to support varieties of narrow and violent nationalism, xenophobia and contempt, and even the mistreatment of those who are different."

Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property.Tweet

Such "narrow forms of nationalism" regards immigrants as "usurpers who have nothing to offer," he writes, observing that "certain populist political regimes, as well as certain liberal economic approaches, maintain that an influx of migrants is to be prevented at all costs."

Francis' encyclical heavily accentuates migration. The entire fourth chapter, titled "A Heart Open to the Whole World," is dedicated to this topic and a subchapter is labeled "Without Borders."

Image
Francis' bodyguards accompany him into the basilica in Assisi

Defending refugees as well as economic migrants, Francis notes that while some "migrants have fled from war, persecution and natural catastrophes," others, "rightly, are seeking opportunities for themselves and their families" and want to create the conditions for a better future.

The Holy Father concedes that some migrants "are attracted by Western culture, sometimes with unrealistic expectations that expose them to grave disappointments" while others are exploited by "unscrupulous traffickers, frequently linked to drug cartels or arms cartels."

Dismissing free market capitalism as a "dogma of neoliberal faith," Francis quotes his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si' pointing out how "the Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute or inviolable, and has stressed the social purpose of all forms of private property."

Francis also categorically condemns both war and the death penalty as no longer justifiable on any grounds.

In an age of "nuclear, chemical and biological warfare," war is no longer a solution, "because its risks will probably always be greater than its supposed benefits."

Hence, "it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a 'just war,'" he declares.

Contrary to the clear teaching of Scripture and 2,000 years of Sacred Tradition, Francis re-states his abrogation of the death penalty: "Today we state clearly that 'the death penalty is inadmissible' and the Church is firmly committed to calling for its abolition worldwide."

I do not want to speak of divine retribution, nor would it be sufficient to say that the harm we do to nature is itself the punishment for our offenses.Tweet

In a section on the pandemic caused by the Wuhan virus, Francis repeats his refrain on "nature's revenge." He writes: "I do not want to speak of divine retribution, nor would it be sufficient to say that the harm we do to nature is itself the punishment for our offenses."

Unsurprisingly, in a document pregnant with socio-political concerns the pontiff does not mention "salvation" or the uniqueness of Jesus and his salvific work on the cross even once in the eight chapters of his encyclical.

Image
Pope Francis signing the encyclical on St. Francis' tomb

The Blessed Virgin Mary is acknowledged as someone who "wants to give birth to a new world, where all of us are brothers and sisters, where there is room for all those whom our societies discard, where justice and peace are resplendent."

In Francis' encyclical, the "Gospel of Jesus Christ" is not God's offer of repentance and salvation, but becomes "the wellspring of human dignity and fraternity" which gives rise "to relationship, to the encounter with the sacred mystery of the other, [and] to universal communion with the entire human family."

The pope refrains from mentioning "evangelization" or "the proclamation of the Gospel," quoting Vatican II's Nostra Aetate to reassure readers that "the Church esteems the ways in which God works in other religions, and 'rejects nothing of what is true and holy in these religions.'"

Abortion is also not explicitly mentioned, though the "unborn" and the "elderly" are named in a sub-section titled "A 'Throwaway' World." However, the pope condemns racism as "a virus that quickly mutates and, instead of disappearing, goes into hiding, and lurks in waiting."

Fratelli Tutti concludes with two prayers. The first is a generic "Prayer to the Creator" which invokes God as "Father of our human family" but does not name Jesus or the Holy Trinity.

The second, is an "Ecumenical Christian Prayer," which addresses God as "Trinity of love" and petitions God to grant that "Christians may live the Gospel, discovering Christ in each human being."

Francis signed the encyclical on St Francis' tomb Saturday afternoon after celebrating Holy Mass in the crypt of the lower basilica in Assisi.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: apostasy; francischism; humanism; progressivism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Unsurprisingly, in a document pregnant with socio-political concerns the pontiff does not mention "salvation" or the uniqueness of Jesus and his salvific work on the cross even once in the eight chapters of his encyclical.

...............................................................................................................

In Francis' encyclical, the "Gospel of Jesus Christ" is not God's offer of repentance and salvation, but becomes "the wellspring of human dignity and fraternity" which gives rise "to relationship, to the encounter with the sacred mystery of the other, [and] to universal communion with the entire human family."

The pope refrains from mentioning "evangelization" or "the proclamation of the Gospel," quoting Vatican II's Nostra Aetate to reassure readers that "the Church esteems the ways in which God works in other religions, and 'rejects nothing of what is true and holy in these religions.'"

1 posted on 10/04/2020 4:50:35 PM PDT by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Coleus; DuncanWaring; Fedora; irishjuggler; Jaded; JoeFromSidney; kalee; markomalley; ...

Ping


2 posted on 10/04/2020 4:51:21 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Nice picture of Francis celebrating ad orientem up top!!!!

As far as I know, Pope Benedict never did that in public.


3 posted on 10/04/2020 4:56:30 PM PDT by Hieronymus (“I shall drink to the Pope, if you please, still, to conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

How do the Pope and the sappy Archbishop of Canterbury differ in their theology? They don’t, and woe to the Christian world.


4 posted on 10/04/2020 5:00:48 PM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Is the Pope Catholic? Not by a long shot...


5 posted on 10/04/2020 5:04:59 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Tutti Frutti


6 posted on 10/04/2020 5:11:09 PM PDT by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo


7 posted on 10/04/2020 5:13:04 PM PDT by jimfree (My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Whew, for a moment I thought Francis became a fan of Little Richard :)


8 posted on 10/04/2020 5:16:50 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beethovenfan

9 posted on 10/04/2020 5:20:19 PM PDT by Textide (Lord, grant that I may always be right, for thou knowest I am hard to turn. ~ Scotch-Irish prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

This Pope has the spirit of anti- Christ.


10 posted on 10/04/2020 5:22:00 PM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

If ever the Church needed courageous, faithful Christ-centered leaders. We’ve been betrayed and abandoned. Come Lord Jesus!


11 posted on 10/04/2020 5:40:02 PM PDT by KierkegaardMAN (This is the sort of stuff up with which I shall not put!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldbux

El Capo del Tutti Frutti.


12 posted on 10/04/2020 5:45:26 PM PDT by goldbux (No sufficiently rich interpreted language can represent its own semantics. -- Alfred Tarski, 1936)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

There's nothing creepier than this mania to create and impose an "objective" secular morality on the world. There's no such thing as "secular morality," period.

If these people really were atheists, their philosophy would be "eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die"--not this bizarre new age nonsense.

13 posted on 10/04/2020 6:17:23 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Modernism began two thousand years ago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Tutti-Fruity oh Rudy


14 posted on 10/04/2020 6:20:47 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Reverse Wickard v Filburn (1942) - and - ISLAM DELENDA EST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Dear Francis. God didn’t not force his will on humanity. He let each and every human being make their own choices and define their own lives as unique individuals. It has only been other human beings who have taken away that freedom of individuals.

If God recognizes the unique worth of individuals, and allows us to choose our own paths, why do you support socioeconomic policies and systems that take away the rights of individuals? Why do you want to take away free will and personal choice and force individuals into a collective?

How do you interpret the parable of the talents? It is attributed to Christ, and it appears to say that rewards are given commensurate with effort. How does that fit with forced redistribution of property and wealth? God encourages charity and giving, but he allows it to be a choice. You are advocating a socioeconomic system that takes away that choice.

Shouldn’t you be instead encouraging people to follow God and make the right choices as individuals - by their own free will, instead of promoting political policies and structures that take away their God given right to self determine?


15 posted on 10/04/2020 6:26:32 PM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus
I know Benedict celebrated the Tridentine Mass in his private Masses.

And I did find this: Benedict XVI to Publicly Celebrate Tridentine Mass in November (2012)?

Whether he ever did or not, I do not know. But he did mysteriously renounce the papacy just a few months later.

And the above photo of Francis appears to be a private Mass, also. Note the lack of altar servers.

16 posted on 10/04/2020 6:28:28 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

I think he knows what creates human misery and thinks that human misery is good for the Church, or what God wills for Man.


17 posted on 10/04/2020 6:39:07 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Pope Benedict didn’t.

And while I have no problems believing that he did celebrate the ‘62 privately, he kept photographs out.

I also understand that JPII routinely celebrated the NO ad orientem privately.

That Francis would let a photo out is a big deal.


18 posted on 10/04/2020 6:39:19 PM PDT by Hieronymus (“I shall drink to the Pope, if you please, still, to conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

And the above photo of Francis appears to be a private Mass, also. Note the lack of altar servers.
.............................................
I’ve heard all the altar servers he uses are female.


19 posted on 10/04/2020 6:53:15 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (Read the "color revolution" election analysis of Darren Beattie (frightening!).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

“Christian tradition has never held the right to property as absolute.”

Well, except for this:

” The first and most fundamental principle, therefore, if one would undertake to alleviate the condition of the masses, must be the inviolability of private property.”

— Rerum Novarum written by Pope Leo XIII and reiterated by Pope Pius XI, Pope John XXIII, Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI.


20 posted on 10/04/2020 7:18:10 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson