This thread, like as some other provocative ones you insisted on posting, is not simply about ecumenically discussing beliefs, but is part of the Catholic hyper exaltation of Mary way above that which is written, explicit or inferred, and thus it is provocative, and warrants reproof.
And it is the desperate nature of your attempted polemics that is rightfully
On another note.. had you heard of this "fetal Microchimerism" condition before reading my (original) post? Just curious.
No, but I can see why a Cath would want to latch on to it, while Mary also had the hereditary DNA of sinners, which Catholics do not highlight.
Well, I’m sure you’d agree Christianity is fundamentally provocative. You Also would have to agree not all my posts are provocative.... and for balance, I even receive the ire of some of my rad trad Catholic friends in the forum... and do not fear digging deeper....
No, but I can see why a Cath would want to latch on to it, while Mary also had the hereditary DNA of sinners, which Catholics do not highlight.
Ecumenically speaking, I attempted to show you that Caths share common ground with the Reformation rebels in that we share common ground in the generation of Mary. And if Mary was part of God’s plan for bringing Salvation into this world.... we just feel then that’s something to love and latch onto, without diminishing Christ.