Because there is no evidence that I'm aware of indicating that she did. She certainly hasn't indicated that she has.
And BTW, she isn’t the only frontline doctor making similar claims, are all those standing next to her all presenting fake cases too?
No way of knowing. There have been a lot of studies offered for review indicating that HCQ doesn't help. But there have also been studies offered for peer review saying that it does. Why doesn't Dr. Immanuel and these others do the same?
RE: But there have also been studies offered for peer review saying that it does. Why doesn’t Dr. Immanuel and these others do the same?
There are two possibilities... these doctors are lying or these doctors are telling the truth.
If the former, they are scammers and the most despicable people in society. Their licenses to practice should be revoked for lying.
If the latter, they are heroes trying to do what’s best for patients in the face of all the attacks they are facing from many powerful sources. They are willing to face vilification to show that an effective treatment exists for a dreaded disease.
So, next question why haven’t they submitted their cases for peer review, you ask.
Firstly, let’s get one thing out of the way... their purpose in coming out publicly is to demand that the powers that be not be obstacles for them to prescribe a drug that they observe works for their patients.
Secondly, these doctors presented their cases in two hour long videos on YouTube, Facebook and in their own website.
ALL WERE TAKEN DOWN! Even their own web provider took down their website!
How do you expect them to present their cases with these wholesale, coordinated blocking of what they want to show?
What about demanding that they at least be heard so that skeptical peers can critique their presentations instead of silencing them?