Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ebb tide

Many of them were, but restating them can be useful.


6 posted on 07/25/2020 7:28:53 PM PDT by Hieronymus (“I shall drink to the Pope, if you please, still, to conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.Â)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Hieronymus

Mixing a teaspoon of sugar with a gallon of cyanide is never useful.

By the way, you said “many” not “all”. What “good things” did the Council produce that were not obvious prior to the Council?

Was one of them that Catholics worship the same “god” the murderous muslims kill in the name of?


7 posted on 07/25/2020 7:37:13 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Hieronymus
In the 14th century, Clement V bemoaned that in Christian lands one hears “the public invocation of the sacrilegious name of Mahomet”; in the 15th century, Callixtus III denounced Islam as a “diabolical sect.” Pius II warned against Muhammad as a “false prophet,” and Pope Eugene condemned “the abominable sect of Mahomet”; in the 16th century Pope Leo X portrayed the Muslims as replacing the light of salvation with “totally unyielding blindness”; and in the 18th century, Pope Benedict XIV castigated Christians who indirectly promote “the errors of Mohammed” when they take Muslim names in order to avoid taxation and other penalties by Muslim authorities.

And there was harsh criticism of Islam in past centuries by saints such as Thomas Aquinas, or John of Damascus, who called Islam “diabolical.”

The Church and Islam

9 posted on 07/25/2020 8:20:33 PM PDT by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson