Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: marshmallow

Fault Lloyd’s for not investigating or reading a news paper prior to issuing such a policy.


4 posted on 07/23/2020 7:54:22 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf Smith

Agreed. This isn’t 1980. The internet is open and searchable to all. A little due diligence would have disclosed that with the June application for excess coverage, a short search would have turned up the February allegations. LoL could have excluded coverage for acts of any clergy prior to June.


5 posted on 07/23/2020 8:03:33 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Deaf Smith

No. Fault Loyds of London for actually providing insurance to cover damages for this type of behaviour. Yes I used the British u.


6 posted on 07/23/2020 8:08:37 PM PDT by CJ Wolf ( #wwg1wga #Godwins #150Kclub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson