You conveniently-ignore the main body of my comment. To-wit:
“The oldest copies of the Masoretic Text only date back to the 10th century, nearly 1000 years after the time of Christ.”
https://theorthodoxlife.wordpress.com/2012/03/12/masoretic-text-vs-original-hebrew/
Thus the Old Testament inscription you reference in the OP is wrong and the debate about the image moot.
I’m not going to comment further. Obviously this is an area of interest for you, but I refuse to wade into a debate (or argument) about a text which had been so heavily modified over those early centuries that this is a perfect example of extracting truth from the OT texts and being honest enough to concede that some content was “filler”.
I know about the article you cited.
Where am I wrong?
There were two inscriptions I listed - a.) one Silver Scroll, b.) then another, then I brought up there were other inscriptions, and then I brought up the two tablets.
The Proto Sinatic inscriptions have also been referenced and there are more than one.
You only reference one inscription. Which one?
And yes the oldest MT copy is the Leningrad Codex, next I believe is the Aleppo which has a missing or stolen Torah.
Btw, prove what was or wasn’t “filler” or concede you are diverting the thread.