I listened to Jase summary. Daniel’s summary was the same for the Old Testament (Preparation) and for the Gospel (Presentation). Jase wrapped up Acts, the Epistles and Revelation into one thing “He’s coming back”, whereas Daniel, I think more accurately broke them down into Proclaimation, Explanation, and Consumation.
That aside, and giving due respect to the "accuracy" of that five-point summary, which no doubt pleases seminary professors, Bible scholars and commentary writers everywhere, I much prefer Jase's version, for two reasons: its ostentatious focus on Jesus and its simple 1-2-3 progression (coming >> here >> returning) make it substantially more memorable--which, after all, was the point of his verbal summary: to help his audience to "learn" the Bible.