Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ebb tide

I am not sure what’s wrong with this cardinal’s statement. The term, “Protestant” original meant “protestor” against the pope. Luther protested against the pope of his day.


5 posted on 01/28/2020 9:46:54 AM PST by rintintin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rintintin
The term, “Protestant” original meant “protestor” against the pope. Luther protested against the pope of his day.

Nice try, but the Protestants were not mere protesting against the pope but of all the bishops and 1500 years of Church teaching.

20 posted on 01/28/2020 9:58:44 AM PST by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: rintintin
I am not sure what’s wrong with this cardinal’s statement. The term, “Protestant” original meant “protestor” against the pope.

Here's what is wrong with it. The Catholics he is addressing are "protesting" the desertion of Catholic doctrine, dogma, tradition and even basic tenets of Natural Law by the hierarchy. The Pope himself is a guardian of these things. It binds him (that's what "tradition" means). The protestants of 500 years ago did not simply abandon the Pope, they made numerous changes to the theology and teachings. Even the "Old Catholics" of 140 years ago (after Vatican I) did not simply abandon the Pope, but made numerous doctrinal changes as well.
65 posted on 01/28/2020 12:35:24 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson