I did say probably not great law. But the sentiment ... sue me if you want.
From a legal standpoint, I would probably come down on the side that there is not legal standing for those who didn't get diddled or weren't very closely touched, so to speak, by the diddling.
But in the court of life -> there is standing. I've got it and everyone who doesn't do this has got it.
I don't see how the world would be worse if this organization - this entity of men and women - disappeared. I'm not talking about the men and women who are innocent and count themselves as members, and I"m not declaring I'm right, but I am declaring that I don't see how I'm wrong, and would welcome hearing the reason why I'm wrong if you've got one.