I’m ambivalent.
On the one hand, I’d like to see all predatory pervert priests get what’s coming to them.
On the other, a lot of false charges have been made in the name of “recovered memories”.
Way to go you baby raping SOBs. The catholic church will never fully cooperate with LE or AG offices and will always cover for their pedophile priests.
Much ado about nothing.
The cases still have to be proven.
IMO, extending statute of limitation is unwise.
There is simply no way to expect a jury to figure out the facts of a case after many decades have passed.
It is an open invitation for fraud by scheming individuals and their crooked lawyers.
Anyway, time wounds all heels.
How does someone defend himself against a criminal complaint that happened 35 years ago?