The better question to ask is, was it a legitimate conclave? If Pope Benedict XVI was forced to resign, then the resignation was not valid and he is still the true Pope (which is what I believe). If Benedict is still the true Pope, then Bergolio is nothing but a usurper, and anything he has to say is null and void. If he got in by subterfuge, then why should anyone be surprised at his anti-Christian rants? He’s a tool of the Father of Lies.
Insightful also.