Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ealgeone

It is a logical fallacy (ie, a “genetic fallacy”) to object to an argument based on its source. The question is whether the argument is valid or not, which in this case, it is. Try answering the argument rather attacking the messenger.


50 posted on 10/07/2019 12:44:29 PM PDT by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: fidelis; ealgeone; daniel1212

Ah, but we aren’t dismissing the arguments because they come from Tim.

We’re pointing out that Tim Staples arguments are lame and easily disproved nonsense 99.9% of the time.


51 posted on 10/07/2019 1:34:38 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: fidelis
It is a logical fallacy (ie, a “genetic fallacy”) to object to an argument based on its source. The question is whether the argument is valid or not, which in this case, it is. Try answering the argument rather attacking the messenger.

Would you make the same argument for allowing passages from the Koran or the Book of Mormon?

False teaching is false teaching.

52 posted on 10/07/2019 1:51:52 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson