To: ealgeone
It is a logical fallacy (ie, a genetic fallacy) to object to an argument based on its source. The question is whether the argument is valid or not, which in this case, it is. Try answering the argument rather attacking the messenger.
50 posted on
10/07/2019 12:44:29 PM PDT by
fidelis
(Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
To: fidelis; ealgeone; daniel1212
Ah, but we aren’t dismissing the arguments because they come from Tim.
We’re pointing out that Tim Staples arguments are lame and easily disproved nonsense 99.9% of the time.
51 posted on
10/07/2019 1:34:38 PM PDT by
Luircin
To: fidelis
It is a logical fallacy (ie, a genetic fallacy) to object to an argument based on its source. The question is whether the argument is valid or not, which in this case, it is. Try answering the argument rather attacking the messenger. Would you make the same argument for allowing passages from the Koran or the Book of Mormon?
False teaching is false teaching.
52 posted on
10/07/2019 1:51:52 PM PDT by
ealgeone
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson