Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: FreshPrince; fidelis
Strange isnt it? 1000 yrs later some mentally ill Priest claims books in the Bible are not. Again, by what authority? He had none.

By what authority did other Catholic scholars have for not accepting all the canon that you hold to now?

What infallible, indisputable canon did Luther differ from?

What books of your Bible did Luther not include in his translation?

What binding canon did Luther set forth?

By what authority did a man in a hairy garment who are insects have in reproving those who sat in the seat of Moses?

By what authority did people have for following itinerant preachers such as the above when said authorities rejected them?

26 posted on 10/06/2019 7:32:02 PM PDT by daniel1212 ( Trust the risen Lord Jesus to save you as a damned and destitute sinner + be baptized + follow Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
"By what authority did other Catholic scholars have for not accepting all the canon that you hold to now?

What infallible, indisputable canon did Luther differ from?

What books of your Bible did Luther not include in his translation? What binding canon did Luther set forth?

By what authority did a man in a hairy garment who are insects have in reproving those who sat in the seat of Moses?

By what authority did people have for following itinerant preachers such as the above when said authorities rejected them?"

All good questions and very answerable. However, since nobody has bothered to answer the questions I have repeatedly asked, I won't waste my time answering these until I get some answers. The way a conversation works is that one side asks a question, then the other side answers. Then the other side asks their own questions, and then the first side answers, and so forth. One sided conversations where people let themselves get led around by the nose are for chumps.

28 posted on 10/06/2019 8:15:49 PM PDT by fidelis (Zonie and USAF Cold Warrior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: daniel1212

>>By what authority did other Catholic scholars have for not accepting all the canon that you hold to now?

Individually, they had none.

>>What infallible, indisputable canon did Luther differ from

Luther removed books that were accepted as canonical. The infallablility declaration is often made to only formalize what was already deemed as such when someone like Luther goes heretic.

>>What books of your Bible did Luther not include in his translation?

He effectively did this to the deauteronical(sp) by saying they were not inspired.

>>What binding canon did Luther set forth?

Nothing he did was “binding” on anyone.

>>By what authority did a man in a hairy garment who are insects have in reproving those who sat in the seat of Moses?

Sorry, Luther was no John the Baptist


162 posted on 10/16/2019 1:54:43 PM PDT by FreshPrince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson