Posted on 10/02/2019 9:50:35 AM PDT by Morgana
The Little Sisters of the Poor have asked the Supreme Court to once again protect them from being forced to fund abortions. Over the past three years the Supreme Court has twice protected the Catholic nuns, but pro-abortion state officials have filed new lawsuits trying to force the Catholic order to pay for abortions in their health care plan.
In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Trump, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro threatened the Little Sisters’ ministry by challenging their religious exemption, forcing the Little Sisters to continue to defend themselves in court. After a loss in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the order of Catholic nuns is asking the Supreme Court to end their six year-long legal battle and let them keep their focus on serving the elderly poor.
In May 2016, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned lower court rulings against the Little Sisters and granted them an exemption from the Obama HHS mandate, which required the nuns to fund abortion pills in their health care plans or pay millions of dollars in fines. In 2018, the Trump administration announced a new rule protecting religious non-profits, including the Little Sisters, but several states, including Pennsylvania and California, immediately sued the federal government to take that protection away, forcing the Little Sisters back to court.
“It has been six long years since we began our legal battle against government mandates that threaten our ministry,” said Mother Loraine Marie Maguire of the Little Sisters of the Poor. “We hope we have finally reached the end of this arduous process, that the Supreme Court will reaffirm their previous decision, and that we will soon be able to keep our focus on the elderly poor.”
In 2016, the government admitted, before the Supreme Court, that it has ways to get abortion-causing drugs to women without forcing the Little Sisters of the Poor to participate. In fact, California and Pennsylvania each have programs for providing tax-funded abortions to women who want them. Yet these States sued to enforce the federal mandate on religious non-profits like the Little Sisters.
“This is a nonsensical political battle that has dragged on six years too long. These states have not been able to identify a single person who would lose contraceptive coverage under the new HHS rule, but they won’t rest until Catholic nuns are forced to pay for contraceptives,” said Mark Rienzi, president of Becket. “It is time for the Supreme Court to finally put this issue to rest.”
President Trump has stood with the Little sisters in their battle.
During the Faith & Freedom Coalition conference in Washington this year, President Donald Trump defended the conscience rights of pro-life doctors and nurses. He also stood up for the Little Sisters of the Poor, the group of Catholic nuns that is still fighting in court against being forced to pay for abortion-causing drugs.
“When I asked for your support in 2016, Americans of faith were under assault. But the shameful attempt to suppress religious believers ended the day I took the oath of office,” the president said.
“My administration has taken historic action to protect religious liberty. We’re protecting the conscience rights of doctors and nurses and teachers and groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor. We’re with them,” Trump told the audience of hundreds of Christian voters.
In 2017, pro-abortion attorneys general in Pennsylvania, California and several other states filed lawsuits to overturn new religious protections issued by the Trump administration. The new rules protect the Little Sisters of the Poor and other religious employers from having to pay for birth control drugs and devices that may cause abortions in their employee health care plans.
The Little Sisters won a victory at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016, but the new lawsuits pushed them back into court.
The Obamacare mandate forces employers to provide every form of birth control, including types that may cause abortions, in their employee health plans. Many religious employers, like the Hobby Lobby craft store chain, do not oppose providing most forms of birth control, but they do oppose the types that may end an unborn baby’s life.
Whats more, the Obama administration carved out exemptions for huge corporations like ExxonMobil and PepsiCo but not for religious individuals. Lawyers with the Becket Foundation, which represent the Little Sisters, pointed out that Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro did not challenge the exemptions for those big businesses.
Shapiro and other pro-abortion attorneys general have claimed that the Trump administration rules violate the First and Fifth Amendments because they put employers’ religious rights over women’s and deny women equal protection under the law, Patch reports.
But even Shapiro admitted that the HHS mandate under Obama was “extremely narrow,” leaving little room for religious exemptions.
Trump’s order limits a rule created under the Obama administration’s Affordable Care Act that required employers, including non-church religious organizations, to cover all forms of contraception at no cost to the employees, including birth control drugs and devices that can cause abortions.
Mark Rienzi, senior counsel at Becket and lead attorney for the Little Sisters, previously told LifeNews: “Sadly Josh Shapiro and [California Attorney General] Xavier Becerra think attacking nuns is a way to score political points. These men may think their campaign donors want them to sue nuns, but our guess is most taxpayers disagree. No one needs nuns in order to get contraceptives, and no one needs these guys reigniting the last administration’s divisive and unnecessary culture war.”
The controversial birth control mandate has twice made it to the Supreme Court where it sided with both Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters.
The court ruled that Hobby Lobby and other similar businesses were protected by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, which states that an individual’s religious expression shouldn’t be “substantially burdened” by a law unless there is a “compelling government interest.”
In the Hobby Lobby ruling, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the ACA birth control rule “would put these merchants to a difficult choice: either give up the right to seek judicial protection of their religious liberty or forgo the benefits, available to their competitors, of operating as corporations.”
Why does this keep coming up? Isn’t the Supreme Court the final say?
Only when approving of abortion, then it’s ‘settle law’, the law of the land, and a basic right that’s in the Constitution.....somewhere, just can’t find it at the moment.
Its never the final say with democrats.
Who are abortionists? flaming, man-hating feminazis. They hate the church for daring to say that certain acts are against nature and are disordered.
They hate so much that they can’t leave a bunch of nuns alone to live their life and faith.
The thing of it is— people who are Catholic - having received the sacraments- cannot be former Catholics. They will be judged as Catholic on judgement day. They know this. They had been told this in sacramental education.
They look to these nuns for approval and absolution. If the nuns - the holier, the more lure, the more valuable. If the nuns give in to abortion, which they will not, they think they’re good.
That and the enemy attacks those closest to God. The rest of everyone it’s got on its side already.
Why does this keep coming up? Isn’t the Supreme Court the final say?
YES and they have already decided, the only way to Stop this crap is for the Supreme Court themselves to Hold the Lawyers filing this frivolous, already decided case, in CONTEMPT of Court and JAIL THEM ON THE SPOT, Refer them to the BAR for Permanent Disbarment, and JAIL the Plaintiff also.
Hitler in Hell is jealous that they never got the backing that the modern American government funded and Constitutionally backed murder gets.
As a general rule, the Supreme Court tries to rule on a case in the simplest manner it can. I haven’t studied the former cases involving this charity but I suspect the court formerly has invalidated a state law or its application to this charity on rather narrow grounds. So the state probably goes back, rejiggers its law or application and contends it now controls Little Sisters. Conservatives on the court, in keeping with historical philosophy, avoid making sweeping legal changes from the bench and prefer the legislative arm to do the heavy lifting. Where they haven’t done so, the result has usually been very contentious, a la abortion, gay marriage, etc.
The baby killers won’t be happy until every conservative or religious organization has to join the slaughter.
Only when it issues a leftist ruling.
The leftist assault on civilization depends on widespread abortion.
Also make them pay 6 years of legal fees.
Better option would be to award the Sisters by assigning all court costs to the plaintifs, as well as 3x lawyer fees of the Sisters and revoke the individual state lawyer’s immunity. Thus forcing them to pay out of their own pockets.
That will shift the legal field by having dozens of lawyers lining up to support the Sisters.
They are probably thinking that if they can just drag this out for another year or two Pope Francis will order the Sisters to capitulate.
When does it become a crime to deliberately harass individuals whose religious rights have already been tested in a court of law, and declared legal based on the U.S. Constitution by the Supreme Court of America?
That is what Pennsylvania gets for electing who they did in the last election. Democrats have no morals and object to people who do. The will try to defeat any attempt to remain moral. With this case, Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro proves it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.