I don't know what you're saying here, but the writings in the Talmud are far from being focused on Christianity. It is, essentially, a collection of hate-writings directed at all non-Jews that justifies all manner of crimes.
The only difference between the Rabbinical writings and Islam is that the Rabbinical writings recommend passive aggressiveness and stabs in the back instead of direct war.
I realize all this is in vain, but the Talmud is not anti-gentile. It is, however, anti-chrstian (and other false religions).
The only difference between the Rabbinical writings and Islam is that the Rabbinical writings recommend passive aggressiveness and stabs in the back instead of direct war.
And I assume you insist that in this the ee-vil religion of the Talmud is "totally different" from the Judaism of the Bible. This from someone who advocates the replacement of Biblical Judaism by a new religion. I have an idea. Why don't you convert to a new religion? Lead by example.
True, the ancient Israelites of the Biblical era weren't so passive aggressive. They attacked head on. Are you even familiar with the Biblical laws of warfare? Eight nations were ordered completely exterminated (seven down--one to go). They also were given permission to wage milchamot reshut (wars not ordered by G-d but to enlarge the borders of Israel). If the nation on the other end sued for peace they had to convert to the Noahide Laws and pay tribute. If they didn't . . . well . . . let's just say that Biblical Judaism has far more in common with islam than it does with chrstianity, especially low church Protestantism.