“Yet, catholics will not disown him.”
This Catholic disowns him. He’s a manifest heretic. Yet I am not going to surrender the Church to him because, as the saying goes, “That would be letting the terrorists win.”
How has what he said in the OP any different than what Vatican II and the rest of the Vatican II popes have been saying and teaching when they teach and profess the Catholic Church merely SUBSISTS in (Rather than IS) Christ’s Church? Which completely contradicts Catholic teaching prior to it.