[Mrs. Don-o]

Which is why He said, “Eat.”

[MHGinTN]

Your ignorance can be fixed, but the arrogance of assuming to teach when you don't know the Truth of the Gospel is astounding!

The Risen, Glorified Jesus does not draw Life from blood, so you cannot be getting the blood of the Risen Jesus in the magic wafer your priest feeds to you, thus you are not ingesting eternal life at Mass. Your assertion of ingesting the body, blood, and divinity of The Risen Glorified Jesus is a blasphemy.

1 Cor 15:50 I tell you this, brothers: flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God, nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. 51 Behold! I tell you a mystery. We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised imperishable, and we shall be changed. 53 For this perishable body must put on the imperishable, and this mortal body must put on immortality. 54 When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written:
“Death is swallowed up in victory.”
55“O death, where is your victory?
O death, where is your sting?”

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Which is why He said, “Eat.”

No, but when one is overtaken byRome-blindness, they carry prebelief in something that isn't in the text and can see only that.

In theological circles we speak of eisegesis to describe this phenomenon.

noun, plural eis·e·ge·ses [ahy-si-jee-seez] .

an interpretation, especially of Scripture, *that expresses the interpreter's own ideas, bias, or the like*, rather than the meaning of the text.

[ealgeone]

And in context, do this in remembrance of me.

This is a result of salvation, not a means of salvation.