Also, if it's true that if I had just the Gospel of John, I would have what I need for salvation (that may be trrue in a sense!) I could just as truly say that If I had just the first CHAPTER of John I would have what I need, since in tells me about Christ, the Light which "enlightens every man", who was come into the world, and "from His fullness we have all received."
Or perhaps I would need only a couple of verses from Matthew:
Jesus replied: "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself.In which case, all we need is maybe Deuteronomy 6:5 or Deuteronomy 10:12.All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."
But this is minimalism, or a most unwise reductionism. If that's "it", then--- hey! The Bible comprises 30,000+ verses! And so, most of what God has given us, is a pile of unneeded redundancies --- a pile of distractions, as it were.
That's major error. God forbid that anyone should think that.
Philip: "Thinkest thou that thou understandest what thou readest?"
The Ethiopian royal official: : "And how can I, unless some man show me?" (Acts 8:26-40)
Bogus argument.
You claim "tradition" is essential.
But which part(s) of "tradition" do you accept or reject?
Which ones are THE authoritative ones to use?
That's not how Scripture says it was done.
Reread the Timothy passage again.