Posted on 07/20/2019 3:29:28 PM PDT by ReformationFan
BFL
Agreed.
Thank you.
I did not sat he was either, and disparaged the claim that he was a Catholic, while i merely provided a link to the attempt to present him as a devout Christian based upon an anecdotal remark." Meaning that I see no real warrant for that claim.
The moon DOES rotate - once per orbit around the Earth.
Telescopes on Mars can see it quite clearly.
Did Sheila Jackson-Fleas teach you that? Or Hank Johnson?
HMMMmmm
PROTS take communion but do NOT believe it turns into the 'real' body and blood of Jesus.
Who knew that mere BELIEF had such power?
Well; some folks had to ask a DIRECT question to get a DIRECT answer...
25 When they found him on the other side of the lake, they asked him, Rabbi, when did you get here?
26 Jesus answered, Very truly I tell you, you are looking for me, not because you saw the signs I performed but because you ate the loaves and had your fill. 27 Do not work for food that spoils, but for food that endures to eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you. For on him God the Father has placed his seal of approval.
28 Then they asked him, What must we do to do the works God requires?
29 Jesus answered, The work of God is this: to believe in the one he has sent.
30 So they asked him, What sign then will you give that we may see it and believe you? What will you do? 31 Our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness; as it is written: He gave them bread from heaven to eat.[c]
32 Jesus said to them, Very truly I tell you, it is not Moses who has given you the bread from heaven, but it is my Father who gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is the bread that comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.
34 Sir, they said, always give us this bread.
35 Then Jesus declared, I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty. 36 But as I told you, you have seen me and still you do not believe. 37 All those the Father gives me will come to me, and whoever comes to me I will never drive away. 38 For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. 39 And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. 40 For my Fathers will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.
THIS what?
They were eating a PASSOVER meal.
"One indeed is the universal Church of the faithful, outside which no one at all is saved, in which the priest himself is the sacrifice, Jesus Christ, whose body and blood are truly contained in the sacrament of the altar under the species of bread and wine; the bread (changed) into His body by the divine power of transubstantiation, and the wine into the blood, so that to accomplish the mystery of unity we ourselves receive from His (nature) what He Himself received from ours."
--Pope Innocent III and Lateran Council IV (A.D. 1215)
"We are compelled in virtue of our faith to believe and maintain that there is only one holy Catholic Church, and that one is apostolic. This we firmly believe and profess without qualification. Outside this Church there is no salvation and no remission of sins, the Spouse in the Canticle proclaiming: 'One is my dove, my perfect one. One is she of her mother, the chosen of her that bore her' (Canticle of Canticles 6:8); which represents the one mystical body whose head is Christ, of Christ indeed, as God. And in this, 'one Lord, one faith, one baptism' (Ephesians 4:5). Certainly Noah had one ark at the time of the flood, prefiguring one Church which perfect to one cubit having one ruler and guide, namely Noah, outside of which we read all living things were destroyed We declare, say, define, and pronounce that it is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff."
--Pope Boniface VIII, Bull Unam sanctam (A.D. 1302)
Here are some MORE written words of GOD:
Call no man Father.
no
Christ took beard and wine and called it the New covenant. What He initiated was not the Passover meal. Im sure you know the scripture passage
Whether Neil Armstrong was a deist or a Catholic, he could not have participated in a Presbyterian communion in good conscience. If he were a member of the United Church of Christ, he could have, as both groups hold to a similar, Reformed position that the Lords Supper is symbolically, but not physically present in the bread and wine, rather than physically present in the elements (Lutheran) or actually transformed into Christs Body and Blood (Catholic).
Is that a deist belief though? As a Catholic, I know a Catholic is not allowed to participate in a Presbyterian communion service.
Having said that, it appears that there are conflicting reports on the internet regarding his religious beliefs. I have seen Christian (with no specific denomination), deist, as well as no religious affiliation. I was unable to locate any that state he was a Catholic.
So if Buzz Aldrin had walked into NASA Food & Beverage Department dragging a short skinny Catholic Priest and asked:
Hey, can Y’All Dehydrate this Specialty for Me ?
And They said: Yes Sir, We can and will. Are You going to Eat this or bring it back to Life ?
Buzz replied: I would like to bring it back to Life because I have a few people that are complaining if I do the Communion Myself it will not be REAL.
Then a would that make it a real Communion at your standards ?
Yes AND he said of the bread
This is my body broken for you . . .
Thats not in the Passover script but its definitely enriched by that context
And the three mighty men brake through the host of the Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that was by the gate, and took it, and brought it to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto the Lord. And he said, Be it far from me, O Lord, that I should do this: is not this the blood of the men that went in jeopardy of their lives? therefore he would not drink it. (2 Samuel 23:16-17)
Here, David clearly calls drinking water human blood, and consistent with the command of Deuteronomy 12:16; 15:23 (cf. Lv. 17:10,11), he poured it on to the ground, and did so as an act of worship unto the Lord. What David did not do was contrive some metaphysical justification for drinking this, but to be consistent with the professed plain-language hermeneutic Catholics insist they hold to in regards to "this is my body," then they should also insist this was literal in this case. As well as when God clearly states that the Canaanites were bread:
Only rebel not ye against the LORD, neither fear ye the people of the land; for they are bread for us (Num. 14:9)
Other examples of the use of figurative language for eating and drinking include,
The Promised Land was a land that eateth up the inhabitants thereof. (Num. 13:32)
David said that his enemies came to eat up my flesh. (Ps. 27:2)
And complained that workers of iniquity eat up my people as they eat bread , and call not upon the Lord. (Psalms 14:4)
And the Lord also said, I will consume man and beast; I will consume the fowls of the heaven, and the fishes of the sea, and the stumblingblocks with the wicked; and I will cut off man from off the land, saith the Lord. (Zephaniah 1:3)
While even arrows can drink: I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh ; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, from the beginning of revenges upon the enemy.' (Deuteronomy 32:42)
But David says the word of God (the Law) was sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. (Psalms 19:10)
Another psalmist also declared the word as sweet: How sweet are thy words unto my taste! yea, sweeter than honey to my mouth! (Psalms 119:103)
Jeremiah likewise proclaimed, Your words were found. and I ate them. and your word was to me the joy and rejoicing of my heart (Jer. 15:16)
Ezekiel was told to eat the words, open thy mouth, and eat that I give thee... eat that thou findest; eat this scroll, and go, speak to the house of Israel. (Ezek. 2:8; 3:1)
John is also commanded, Take the scroll ... Take it and eat it. (Rev. 10:8-9 )
And Scripture refers to Christ being spiritual food and drink which even OT believers consumed:
And did all eat the same spiritual meat; "And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ." (1 Corinthians 10:3-4)
And Christ's word in Jn. 6, "I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst," (John 6:35) are correspondent to,
"Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness. Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David." (Isaiah 55:2-3)
Moreover, like as bread is broken, Is. 53:10 states that "it pleased the Lord to bruise him," and the word for "bruise" (da^ka^') means to crumble, to break..., (Strong's). And like as wine is poured out, so Is. 53:12 also states of Christ, "he hath poured out his soul unto death," both of which are correspondent to the words of the Last Supper regarding bread and wine.
And which use of figurative language for Christ and spiritual things abounds in John, using the physical to refer to the spiritual:
Much more , by the grace of God.
Here's where it started...Matthew 26:17-19(ESV)17 Now on the first day of Unleavened Bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Where will you have us prepare for you to eat the Passover? 18 He said, Go into the city to a certain man and say to him, The Teacher says, My time is at hand. I will keep the Passover at your house with my disciples. 19 And the disciples did as Jesus had directed them, and they prepared the Passover . |
Simple. Christ fulfilled the passover which was initiated to point to His sacrificial atoning death for the forgiveness of sin. As He did so He initiated a new covenant for His people to be celebrated
Communion is not the passover celebration. That was done once a year on a specific date, communion is to be celebrated often. The physical elements are different as well. What one believes about the Lords Supper is not a salvation issue and there are wide variations even among Protestants. I love to discuss and support my position as it sharpens my study and belief. However I think this discussion among Christians should only take place after the basics of salvation are agreed upon something that is not true here
i think most of us can agree communion is for saved followers of Christ. Those on this forum cannot even agree what that is so we have bigger fish to fry. Salvation by grace through faith or salvation by works through Mary is an issue that determines where one spends eternity. What you believe about the Lords supper is not. I would love to debate my Christian brothers and sisters on this in a different forum where it is clear there is no daylight between us on the basics of salvation. it becomes a very different discussion with a very different tone at that point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.