Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: erkelly

Yes. Conflating “Ashkenazi” and “Jewish” is a recipe for confusion.

A person who holds a belief in direct contradiction with the Torah is not a Jew, though they may be Ashkenazi.

Failure to make the distinction leads to actual Jews like myself being blamed for anti-Judaic Communists who happen to be of Ashkenazi ethnicity also.

I’m not their human shield and refuse to let Judaism be misappropriated by them to impose that risk on me and other innocent and genuine Jews.


21 posted on 06/11/2019 10:10:56 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The Clinton Coup attempt was a worse attack on the USA than was 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: thoughtomator; erkelly

From erkelly: “So then, you consider a person Jewish only by belief and not by DNA?”

From thoughtomator: “Yes.”

_________________________________

I am reading this thread with great interest.

From all I’ve read the children of a Jewish woman is considered Jewish....

Would your answer to erkelly mean you would qualify children borne of a Jewish woman to be non-Jewish until they have affirmed their Faith in the Jewish belief system?

Where would you stand on the question of if a child borne of a Jewish woman dies before affirming his or her Faith in the Jewish belief system?

In your belief system would the child be considered unfit to be declared a Jew?


101 posted on 06/11/2019 4:01:17 PM PDT by Notthereyet (NotThereYet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson