Posted on 05/17/2019 12:28:45 AM PDT by Morgana
Libs are suddenly a new kind of Bible scholar. Odd though how they equate their brand of Christianity with stuff God hates.
Her father donated to the sex trafficking cult NXIVM in upstate New York.
Gillibrand is pure evil.
She has no problem shoving atheism and secular humanism down everyone’s throat. Abortion is the most holy sacrament to the cult of liberalism.
They have no problem taking Christian businesses and homes from them for not worshiping homosexuality.
“If you are a person of the Christian faith, one of the tenets of our faith is free will,”
Hmm, and all these years I thought it was, “Thou shalt not kill.” She and the fake pope haven’t read the Christian Bible.
10 Commandments.
At #5, we have thou shall not murder.
Free will is not listed. In fact, these commandments place boundaries on personnel free will
...and under no circumstances are we supposed to be imposing our faith on other people...
Why is gubmint imposing Sharia law on We the People???
It’s all about pick and choose what you want from the Free Will buffet
Free will, eh? So, in an exercise of free will, the Christian thing to do is kill you, Kirsten? That seems a little harsh.
Yep. She seems to be trying to argue that "free will" means everyone has a moral right to do anything they want to.
Where does one start with a person as screwed up, uneducated and misinformed as this?
Oh, yeah. With a politician.
So opposing abortion is an attempt to impose the Christian faith on others? I see nothing that requires people to adopt the Christian faith or creeds. I see people and politicians arguing that human life is sacred and should not be subject to subjective termination but that is not an exclusive Christian concept. Many cultures and faiths have expressed the same thing.
A wise man once said there is nothing new under the sun. This is especially true in the expression of values and what we call universal truths. We can always find these have been expressed before, sometimes many times and from many sources beforehand. What people are doing is expressing their own heartfelt values and principles and the source of those values can always be traced to someone else, be it the Bible, the Sanskrit, the Quran, Confucias, Plato, Marx, Rousseau, Freud, Nietzsche, etc. etc.
Should the government have the power to censor heartfelt views of citizens based on the source of those views? If one quotes a Chinese proverb, is he imposing Chinese culture on the listeners? The vegetables in the garden belong to the gardener and not the seed seller. We need to stand up and say, “no, this is not my church speaking, this is me, a citizen, who has the right to express my thoughts, opinions and concerns.”
The younger turk club.
I heard one of their turds quote the bible and then he said the bible was ok with it.
Uhm..no
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.