We need to go further back:
The specific rhetorical question that Michael Brown posed that got him in trouble is itself a deception.
They are seldom gay (emotionally) - and they are never homosexual (physiologically).
There is no such thing as homosexuality. There is no functional form of sexual reproduction - the raison d’etre for sexuality, whether one is a Creationist or an Evolutionist! - between two persons of the same sex.
Before the atheist, pagan falling away in the mid/late Nineteenth Century (influenced by Karl Marx, Richard Wagner, Friedrich Nietzsche, Havelock Ellis, Charles Darwin, George Bernard Shaw, Arthur Conan Doyle, et al), all perversions were simply regarded as the result of “sexual excess”. The word, homosexuality, did not exist before then. The very idea behind the term is inherently absurd.
Sexual excess equals immoral - if not actually unnatural - eroticism, sensuality.
We must stop using leftist terminology for reality; that yields precious philosophical ground to them. They rely on controlling the terms of the debate!
We must call them homoerotic, or homosensual. What they do together is no more real sex than indulging in a foot fetish.
Personally, I define homoeroticism as: The narcissistic fetishization of a person of the same binary sex (nota bene: not ambiguous gender, another term abused by leftists).
Good points, but I am afraid that the word *homosexual* is far too ingrained in society today for your change to be accepted.