Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Catholic Caucus] Thomas Aquinas and the Healing Grace of Study
One Peter Five ^ | March 7, 2019 | Peter Kwasniewski

Posted on 03/07/2019 6:42:57 PM PST by ebb tide

Thomas Aquinas and the Healing Grace of Study

March 7 is the dies natalis, the heavenly birthday — and therefore the traditional liturgical commemoration — of St. Thomas Aquinas, the Angelic Doctor, a Dominican friar who combined childlike innocence, guileless humility, and fervent prayer with one of the most towering intellects the human race has ever seen. He has been put forward by the Church not only as a guide to the truth but as a model of discipleship.

The Lord has granted me the privilege of studying the works of St. Thomas for almost thirty years, and of teaching them for almost twenty. As time passes, I find his writings ever more beautiful and fruitful; I find the principles he invokes deeper in their rootedness, broader in their extension. The articles in the Summa theologiae and the Disputed Questions make for incomparable springboards into difficult matters, providing at every step more material for reflection than one could ever reach the end of.

The way these articles hold together — their order, their internal logic, their movement from point to point, conclusion to conclusion, one light giving rise to another light… One can see why the art historian Erwin Panofsky was so enamored of the Summa-cathedral comparison. The medieval mind that gave us both Gothic architecture and scholasticism has a loving luminosity that transcends both the cold mathematical clarity of Descartes and the wild passions of a Schopenhauer, leading one to see that truth, any truth, is not a small, dark, confining thing, but a pinnacle up in the heavens, a rising of incense and waterfall mist, a great field of flowers with a message greater than the sum of leaf and petal, a window that looks into the soul and outward to God. Truth is the antithesis of smallness (rationalism), darkness (irrationalism), confinement (secularism).

Some find it surprising that St. Thomas, who seemed to think, speak, and dream in syllogisms, was able to compose stirring poetry for the Feast of Corpus Christi. I do not find it surprising at all. He had been a poet in his heart, a troubadour of the transcendentals, long before the verses came from his mind. Jacques Maritain was right to say of the saint’s vast body of work: “The achievement which dominates the flux of the ages … overflowed entirely from the fulness of contemplation in a heart united to eternity.”[i] Thomas found his poet’s voice in the Cross he loved, in the beauty of a love that spills itself out in radiant waves of mercy.

“For this have I come into the world, to bear witness to the truth. Every one who is of the truth hears my voice” (Jn. 18:37). “If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free” (Jn. 8:31–32). St. Thomas heard that voice; he continued in that word; he found the freedom of self-surrender.

We live in an age peculiarly bent on running away from truth, veritas — be it the truth about God and Jesus Christ and the Church He founded; the truth about oneself, friendship, marriage, family, sexuality; the truth about society and the political order. The human heart does not, cannot, cease to long for the truth, but there is no guarantee that our desires will remain uncorrupted. Modern academia exhibits the worst tendencies in this regard. Scholarship exalts the evolutionary paradigm, placing an excessive weight on change and discrepancy rather than continuity and agreement. By rewarding novelty with honors, the university system generates continual motivation for trivia, conflict, and revisionism.

Wahrheit ist Feuer und Wahrheit reden heisst leuchten und brennen.[ii] “Truth is fire, and to speak the truth means to illumine and to burn.” When Jesus spoke, His words were kindling; when He acted, His deeds were light; when He looked into men’s hearts, His gaze was a sword that cut the sincere from the false, the pious friend from the pious fraud. This supreme witness to the truth — Truth incarnate — met with scorn, rejection, torture, and death. He let Himself be buried like a seed in the soil, to burst forth in the glory of an inexhaustible fruitfulness, yielding across the ages a harvest beyond all human reckoning.

Fire, even just embers or sparks, gets around. The good fire of sound doctrine, nourished by a devout life, will not be without offspring. If fragmentation is the problem, fire is the answer, for it belongs to fire to melt what is hardened, to purify the dross and unify the precious. In a youthful work not marred by later cynicism, Yves Congar describes this interplay of thought and thirst, faith and fire:

The source, therefore, of that perfect service of the truth to which St. Thomas devoted his life, was this warm, personal and vital relationship with the truth which we call love … This was due to the fact that, for him, the truth was not merely an object of knowledge, not merely an idea, not even a thing, but a living person to be loved, a living and merciful person who begins by offering himself to our love and by inserting in our frozen souls the warm and vital seed of friendship. This “truth” is, in reality, “the gentle primal truth,” the living God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the adorable Trinity, the Saviour-God, indeed the incarnate Word, the truth who is Jesus Christ. [iii]

Study is an occasion for the Spirit of truth to reveal the face of Jesus to us and conform our face — our eyes, our ears, our mouths — to His [iv]. The end is the blessed vision of God, “face to face.”

We all need to keep reading good and great books, and keep learning our faith. We “graduate” from the academy of grace only when we die and yield our souls to God. The Doctors of the Church speak the fire of truth, which illumines and burns. Their writings enlighten our minds and burn away our compromises, our excuses, our pettiness. St. Thomas stands as a prince among them.

What is the sign that our studies in school or our private endeavors to learn are leading us into greater intimacy with Jesus Christ, the Truth in person? We will hear His words echoing in our hearts when the book is away. We will notice how, without being able to say when it came or where it came from, suddenly His light is cast on our problems or the problems of others with whom we live and work. We will be caught by His gaze, only for a moment, it seems, yet layer after layer of elaborately crafted thoughts are simplified and unified, or a dense tangle of feelings is loosened into calm. We are carried by our studies into a more profound understanding of the mystery of Jesus Himself — the mysteries of His life, His death, His resurrection, all the mysteries of His humiliation and glory. This is what I call the healing grace of study.

In an essay by a student who was applying to an institute where I taught, I once read these words, which so resonated with me that I copied them down:

All those things that orthodox Catholics desire for themselves and their children, namely, a persevering faith, a willingness to make heroic sacrifice, a sense of belonging within the flow of history, a scriptural mindset and an awareness of judgment all flow from the sense of wonder at the Person of the God-Man. Prior to any great renewal of the Church, the faithful must be taught to stand adoring and incensing in the interior temple.

When the Psalmist says, “Your face, O Lord, I shall seek,” he is giving us a motto not only for the Christian life as a whole, but for the particular task of study. Charity’s bright-eyed daughter, Joy, abandons theology when the Lord’s face is not sought. Understanding what is beyond reason, beyond all domination at our hands, comes only to the beggar on bended knee [v].

Our desire for the truth is the good soil in which the Holy Spirit wants to sow the seeds of grace. Light and love can never be separated. The point of studying is to increase and intensify our love for God and our yearning to see His face. “Holy study” unites light and love, so that each can build on the other in an escalating spiral.

It is not odd, though it may at first seem so to us, that this stout intellectual, this “Dumb Ox” whose angelic doctrine has illuminated the globe for seven centuries, was often seen by his brethren tenderly weeping, especially during the celebration of the Holy Mass. Let us, says Maritain, “exert ourselves to love the truth as he himself loved it, that great Doctor whose tranquil eyes were wet with tears, so weary was his heart with waiting for the vision” [vi].

“Three things come together in heavenly fruition — perfect vision, full embracing, and the clinging of consummated love.”[vii] This is what the Angelic Doctor was longing for; this is what we should be aspiring to. If we remember this goal, there is no trial or difficulty we cannot endure.


[i] St. Thomas Aquinas, Angel of the Schools, trans. J. F. Scanlan (London: Sheed & Ward, 1942), 31.

[ii] L. Schefer, quoted in Carl Schorske, Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (New York: Vintage, 1981), 217.

[iii] “St. Thomas: Servant of the Truth,” in Faith and Spiritual Life, trans. A. Manson and L. C. Sheppard (New York: Herder and Herder, 1969), 82.

[iv] Cf. Jn. 14:16–17; Jn. 16:12–14; etc.

[v] Edward D. O’Connor writes: “The Word of God is not a philosophical discourse addressed simply or even primarily to the intellect and susceptible of being apprehended by the intellect alone. It is a Word of Life, summoning men into a personal relationship with the Lord and nourishing, guiding, and confirming them in that relationship. For this reason, it can only be understood deeply and rightly by those who respond personally to its call. There are, of course, superficial levels on which Scripture can be read and understood by the most detached observer; but its profound meaning becomes accessible only in the measure that one enters into that life to which it summons.” Appendix 2, in vol. 24 [I-II.68–70] of the Blackfriars Summa Theologiae (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964), 96.

[vi] Maritain, Angel, 122.

[vii] In I Sent., d. 1, a. 1, arg. 10.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: aquinas; thomas

1 posted on 03/07/2019 6:42:57 PM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Al Hitan; Biggirl; Coleus; DuncanWaring; ebb tide; Fedora; Hieronymus; irishjuggler; G Larry; ...

Ping


2 posted on 03/07/2019 7:00:14 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
The medieval mind that gave us both Gothic architecture and scholasticism has a loving luminosity that transcends both the cold mathematical clarity of Descartes and the wild passions of a Schopenhauer

That medieval mind also gave us the ideas that eventually made it into the early colonial colleges in America which formed the minds of our Founders.

3 posted on 03/08/2019 5:25:43 AM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

“...formed the minds of our Founders...”

Unfortunately the Founders did not factor in original sin (i.e., the tendency for power to corrupt) and write term limits into the Constitution.


4 posted on 03/08/2019 5:39:44 AM PST by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01; ebb tide
Our Founders were trained in moral philosophy - the study of virtues and vices. Their expertise was in fact the understanding of Original Sin, because the early American colleges trained precisely so that the colonies could have good preachers and good judges and that required expertise in understanding the human soul.

In the premiere explanation for the people about the Constitution, The Federalist Papers, "factions" were addressed and because the foils of man were understood they tried to make "factions" as benign as possible.

They did trust the people as a whole and by doing so they placed everything pertaining to the people into the free market, including religion. Each religion would rise or fall on the merit of the people, without government interference.

Also, they believed that the people, collectively, should be the end-decider of how long any one person should serve in a representative capacity. Reps would have 2-4-6 year term limits between elections, however it was up to the people, and it would be the people's fault if bad representatives stayed in office, not the Constitution's fault.

Our Founders should not be faulted for the faction that has taken over the bureaucracy and the democratic party. They also never even thought that one day the evil wife of a president would try to mastermind the complete takeover of the entire system of government, first as first lady and then as president. There is no provision in the Constitution for the role of first lady.

But, they did give us a bulwark which they prayed we would defend. Benjamin Franklin's words come to mind, "a Republic, ma'am, if you can keep it."

5 posted on 03/08/2019 8:56:08 AM PST by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson