I did no such thing. I can only again challenge you to read what I wrote. The first part of my comment is almost a tautology; the second part is a reasonable conclusion from it.
Let's try it this way:
Name for me all the priests, bishops, and cardinals who participated in the Second Vatican Council who were NOT raised, educated, and ordained in "Traditional Catholicism". Think about it before you respond. After you give me that lengthy list of names, we can proceed with our discussion.
>> Name for me all the priests, bishops, and cardinals who participated in the Second Vatican Council who were NOT raised, educated, and ordained in “Traditional Catholicism”. Think about it before you respond. After you give me that lengthy list of names, we can proceed with our discussion.<<
Once again your argument is irrelevant for the simple reason that it is totally beside the point, which point is that those who controlled the machinations of the Council with the goal of “modernizing” the Church, while at the same time foolishly attempting to conform its ecclesiology to liberal Prostestantism, have reduced the Church to a hideous charicature of its pre-Vatican II self.