“It is impossible to make this event (the first resurrection, Rev. 20, when the post-trib rapture takes place) be a pretrib rapture.”
Yep. Like just about every set of verses on the subject, it portrays the tribulation, and the resurrection and second coming together and in the proper sequence. If you notice, most of the pre-trib advocates will only cite a single verse or two in support of their positions, but if you look up those references and read a few verses ahead or behind, it is clear that they cannot support that kind of chronology if read in context.
.
>> “If you notice, most of the pre-trib advocates will only cite a single verse or two in support of their positions” <<
Actually its only a portion of a verse.
And the great falling away into apostasy they convert into being the “Rapture.”
That’s some kind of magic!