For one thing, even "removing celibacy" as a requirement doesn't mean all the heterosexual priests are going to get married. Most of them would NOT--- and if they did, they would leave the priesthood. Why? Because they sure aren't going to bring wives into the rectories, and a priest's salary isn't sufficient to establish an independent household: it's not enough to house and support a wife and kids.
Besides, would you marry a man who would break a vow? If he would break that vow (already taken), why wouldn't he break a vow with YOU? The most important thing you would know about such a man, is that his sacred commitments are not sacred to him: his word is not his bond.
Other churches, with married clergy, have plenty of problems as well. If you think a homosexual wouldn't get married, and I mean to a woman, to keep covering up his sexual secrets, let me say two words: Eugene Robinson. Or four: Episcopal Bishop Eugene Robinson.
The only branches of that does allow for a married priesthood are the Eastern Rites Catholics and the St. Peter’s (Anglican usage) Rite.