Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Sontagged

I’ve been a Christian for 40 years without knowing what “Cessationism” means. Oh well. And he does NOT teach it is OK to take the mark of the beast. He merely says that IF someone who did repented afterward, it would not be “unpardonable” - because it is not what Jesus called the unpardonable sin.

“But to teach that it is okay to take the Mark of the Beast is a damnable heresy.”

And to claim MacArthur says that is a damnable lie! Shame on you!


54 posted on 08/07/2018 7:25:12 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Mr Rogers

Get the actual quote down pat before you defend him.

There is no repenting from the Mark of the Beast, especially if the Mark is a computer chip with a DNA altering mechanism.

Google around for those who believe the miracles done in the 1st Century “ceased” and the Holy Spirit, poured out at Pentecost, somehow departed from the church.


57 posted on 08/07/2018 7:32:40 AM PDT by Sontagged (TY Lord Jesus for being the Way, the Truth & the Life. Have mercy on those trapped in the Snake Pit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson